History
  • No items yet
midpage
97 F.4th 968
D.C. Cir.
2024
Read the full case

Background

  • John Maron Nassif was convicted of four misdemeanors for actions during the January 6, 2021 Capitol riot, including demonstrating in a Capitol building.
  • He entered the Capitol Rotunda, led chants, encouraged rioters, and exited after about ten minutes.
  • Convicted on all four counts after a bench trial, Nassif was sentenced to seven months in prison—below the calculated sentencing guideline range.
  • On appeal, Nassif challenged (1) the constitutionality of the statute prohibiting demonstrations in the Capitol, (2) the guideline used to determine his sentence for disorderly conduct, and (3) whether he was unconstitutionally penalized for going to trial.
  • The district court had previously dismissed Nassif's motions to invalidate the demonstration statute for overbreadth and vagueness, finding the Capitol a nonpublic forum and the law clear as applied to him.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Constitutionality of demonstration statute 40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2)(G) is overbroad/vague and violates First Amendment Statute is reasonable given Capitol's legislative function; not a public forum Statute is facially constitutional; conviction upheld
Sentencing guideline applied Wrong guideline (trespass) was used for § 1752(a)(2) conviction "Obstructing or impeding officers" guideline properly applies Correct guideline was used; sentence affirmed
Trial penalty in sentencing Sentence penalized exercise of right to trial No penalty; lack of guilty plea meant no acceptance of responsibility reduction No unconstitutional penalty found; sentence affirmed

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. Hansen, 599 U.S. 762 (2023) (overbreadth doctrine and facial invalidation principles)
  • United States v. Williams, 553 U.S. 285 (2008) (standard for facial overbreadth challenge)
  • Int'l Soc. for Krishna Consciousness v. Lee, 505 U.S. 672 (1992) (standards for speech restrictions in a nonpublic forum)
  • Perry Educ. Ass’n v. Perry Local Educators’ Ass’n, 460 U.S. 37 (1983) (public forum doctrine)
  • United States v. Grace, 461 U.S. 171 (1983) (Capitol sidewalks as public forum)
  • Hill v. Colorado, 530 U.S. 703 (2000) (limitations of demonstration prohibitions)
  • City of Chicago v. Morales, 527 U.S. 41 (1999) (vagueness doctrine)
  • Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, 561 U.S. 1 (2010) (bar on vagueness-as-applied claims for clearly covered conduct)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. John Nassif
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Published: Apr 9, 2024
Citations: 97 F.4th 968; 23-3069
Docket Number: 23-3069
Court Abbreviation: D.C. Cir.
Log In
    United States v. John Nassif, 97 F.4th 968