History
  • No items yet
midpage
708 F.3d 994
8th Cir.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Zigler pled guilty to production of child pornography under 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a) and (e).
  • District court held Zigler's 1988 Minnesota conviction for attempted use of a minor in a sexual performance qualified as a predicate offense for § 2251(e) enhancement.
  • District court imposed a 300-month (25-year) mandatory minimum.
  • Zigler appeals the judgment.
  • Court applies categorical approach to determine if the prior conviction qualifies as a predicate offense; affirms.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Does Zigler's 1988 Minnesota conviction qualify as a predicate under §2251(e)? Zigler argues the 1988 offense does not relate to production of child pornography. Zigler's position is that the offense relates to production. Yes; the 1988 conviction qualifies under the categorical approach.

Key Cases Cited

  • Sonnenberg v. United States, 556 F.3d 667 (8th Cir. 2009) (defines broad meaning of 'relating to' for predicate offenses and uses categorical approach)
  • United States v. Lockwood, 446 F.3d 825 (8th Cir. 2006) (applies categorical approach to determine predicate offenses for §2251(e))
  • Perrin v. United States, 444 U.S. 37 (Sup. Ct. 1979) (statutory interpretation principle: ordinary meaning of terms)
  • United States v. Williams, 627 F.3d 324 (8th Cir. 2010) (reiterates limitation of considering the defendant's specific conduct under the categorical approach)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Joel Zigler
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Date Published: Feb 12, 2013
Citations: 708 F.3d 994; 2013 WL 500347; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 2878; 12-2299
Docket Number: 12-2299
Court Abbreviation: 8th Cir.
Log In
    United States v. Joel Zigler, 708 F.3d 994