History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Hudson
2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 4731
| 4th Cir. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Hudson was arrested after a traffic stop in Olanta, South Carolina, where police found a .32 caliber revolver.
  • Hudson pled guilty to possessing a firearm by a felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).
  • The district court sentenced him to 180 months under ACCA based on three prior convictions, including two Florida fleeing-or-eluding offenses.
  • Florida §316.1935(2) covers willful fleeing or eluding a marked patrol vehicle with siren and lights; penalties range from up to 5 to 30 years.
  • The key issue was whether the two Florida convictions are “violent felonies” under ACCA’s residual clause.
  • After Begay, Sykes, and related decisions, the Fourth Circuit held that the Florida §316.1935(2) offenses qualify under the residual clause.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Florida §316.1935(2) convictions are ACCA residual-clause violent felonies Hudson argues these are not violent felonies after Begay and Sykes. Government contends the offenses fall within the residual clause as inherently risky vehicular flight. Yes; the Florida offenses qualify under the residual clause.
Whether ACCA's residual clause is unconstitutionally vague Hudson asserts vagueness under the residual clause. Government maintains the clause is constitutionally permissible per Sykes. Waived, and the clause is not void for vagueness.

Key Cases Cited

  • Begay v. United States, 553 U.S. 137 (2008) (guidance on violent felonies under ACCA)
  • Chambers v. United States, 555 U.S. 122 (2009) (rejected Roseboro approach; residual clause analysis refined)
  • Sykes v. United States, 131 S. Ct. 2267 (2011) (upheld violent-felony status for Indiana vehicular flight under residual clause)
  • Rivers v. United States, 595 F.3d 558 (2010) (rejected Roseboro approach; residual-clause analysis refined)
  • Roseboro v. United States, 551 F.3d 226 (2009) (attempted to apply Roseboro analysis to ACCA; later overruled)
  • United States v. James, 550 U.S. 192 (2007) (vehicle flight risks linked to violent-felony analysis)
  • Harrison v. United States, 558 F.3d 1280 (2009) (Eleventh Circuit decision on Florida §316.1935(2) under ACCA)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Hudson
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Mar 7, 2012
Citation: 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 4731
Docket Number: 07-4948
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.