United States v. Holland
2:19-cv-02456
| E.D.N.Y | Sep 20, 2022Background
- The United States sued pro se J. Ronald Holland to collect approximately $1.9 million in unpaid federal taxes.
- David Risk, Holland’s partner (not an attorney), repeatedly appeared and sought appointment as Holland’s “next friend”; the Court denied that application for lack of supporting documentation.
- Holland died on or about May 27, 2022; Risk did not notify the Court of the death. The Government filed a Suggestion of Death on the record, attaching a Suffolk County Medical Examiner letter.
- The Court held a hearing on September 20, 2022; Risk ultimately confirmed Holland’s death and said Holland had an unprobated will and that Risk believed he was the representative.
- The Court held that the Government’s tax-collection claim survives Holland’s death and that any motion to substitute a proper party under Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1) must be filed within 90 days of service of the Suggestion of Death (i.e., by December 7, 2022).
- The Court placed the Government’s pending summary-judgment and sanctions motions in abeyance until a proper party is substituted.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Does the tax-collection claim survive Holland’s death? | Tax collection is remedial and survives; Government may pursue judgment against estate/successors. | No substantive contrary position from Holland; Risk did not argue extinguishment. | Claim survives under federal common law; substitution appropriate. |
| When does the Rule 25 substitution clock start and expire? | Service of the Suggestion of Death (filed Sept. 7, 2022) starts the 90-day window. | No persuasive contrary position. | 90-day window applies; substitution motion due by Dec. 7, 2022. |
| Who qualifies as a “proper party” for substitution (next friend, representative, successor)? | Government may move to substitute a proper party (estate representative or distributee). | Risk claims an unprobated will and asserts he is representative/next friend but produced no probate documentation. | Proper party must be a successor, executor/administrator, or primary beneficiary under state law; Risk not appointed without documentation. |
| What happens to pending motions (summary judgment, sanctions) while substitution unresolved? | Government seeks to proceed to judgment. | Risk sought extensions and participated but did not timely oppose motions. | Motions held in abeyance until a proper party is substituted for Holland. |
Key Cases Cited
- U.S. v. Private Sanitation Indus. Ass'n of Nassau/Suffolk, Inc., 159 F.R.D. 389 (E.D.N.Y. 1994) (federal common law governs whether a claim survives a party’s death)
- Natale v. Country Ford Ltd., 287 F.R.D. 135 (E.D.N.Y. 2012) (defines a "representative" under New York law as one appointed with letters to administer the estate)
