History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Hardy
479 F. App'x 178
10th Cir.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Hardy pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine in 2010 under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).
  • He was sentenced to 96 months to run consecutively with other sentences in 2011; guideline base was 32 with 290 grams of crack.
  • Initial presentence report lowered offense level for acceptance of responsibility; overall range 140–175 months with criminal history V.
  • FSA enacted; district court abated sentencing; a revised report applied November 2010 guidelines but kept the same 140–175 month range; FSA not retroactive.
  • Hardy filed a § 3582(c)(2) motion; district court denied because there was no guideline range reduction and the 18-to-1 ratio was not retroactive; appellate appeal followed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether § 3582(c)(2) authorizes a sentence reduction despite unchanged guidelines range Hardy contends his sentence should decrease since guidelines range didn't drop. Hardy argues district court erred in not reducing sentence under § 3582(c)(2). No reduction because range was not lowered.
Whether the district judge's remarks show bias affecting the ruling Liteky implies bias could require reversal. Remarks did not originate from extrajudicial sources and did not preclude decision. Remarks did not demonstrate impermissible bias; no reversal on bias grounds.
Whether the FSA applies retroactively to Hardy's case FSA retroactivity could allow a lower sentence or mandatory minimum issue. FSA does not apply retroactively in this circuit. FSA not retroactive; inapplicable to reduce sentence.

Key Cases Cited

  • Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540 (U.S. 1994) (bias must be extrajudicial to warrant recusal)
  • United States v. Williams, 575 F.3d 1075 (10th Cir. 2009) (scope of authority under § 3582(c)(2) de novo review)
  • United States v. Lewis, 625 F.3d 1224 (10th Cir. 2010) (FSA not retroactive)
  • United States v. Sidney, 648 F.3d 904 (8th Cir. 2011) (FSA retroactivity issue)
  • United States v. Fisher, 635 F.3d 336 (7th Cir. 2011) (retroactivity of FSA considerations)
  • United States v. Carradine, 621 F.3d 575 (6th Cir. 2010) (FSA retroactivity considerations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Hardy
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 15, 2012
Citation: 479 F. App'x 178
Docket Number: 12-6045
Court Abbreviation: 10th Cir.