History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Godfrey
6:24-cr-00273
M.D. Fla.
Mar 19, 2025
Read the full case

Background

  • Kendall Devon Godfrey entered into a plea agreement to plead guilty to one count of possession of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B) and (b)(2).
  • The investigation began after the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children sent CyberTip reports to law enforcement, indicating that Godfrey had interacted with child sexual abuse material (CSAM) on two Dropbox accounts.
  • The Dropbox accounts were linked to email addresses and an IP address associated with Godfrey, with files containing at least 200 images and five videos of CSAM, including images of prepubescent minors and previously identified CSAM victims.
  • Godfrey initially denied, then admitted to ownership of the Dropbox accounts and associated emails, but claimed only juvenile use and denied possession of CSAM as an adult; forensic evidence contradicted this.
  • The plea agreement includes mandatory restitution, forfeiture of certain assets (including an iPhone), a requirement to register as a sex offender, and waiver of certain rights, including most direct appeals.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Knowing possession of child pornography Godfrey knowingly possessed CSAM on Dropbox, linked via email, IP, and device records Initially denied knowledge or possession, claimed juvenile use, denied adult possession Held: Godfrey admitted knowing possession per plea agreement
Interstate/foreign commerce by computer The CSAM was transported via internet/Dropbox, implicating interstate/foreign commerce element No viable defense offered after admission in plea Held: Factual basis established element; plea accepted
Forfeiture of assets linked to offense Assets used or acquired in CSAM offense are subject to forfeiture Agrees to forfeiture, waives rights to challenge Held: Defendant consents to forfeiture as part of plea
Waiver of appeal rights/sentencing guidelines Plea waives right to appeal except very limited circumstances Agrees to waiver and guidelines sentencing recommendation Held: Waiver is valid and plea accepted

Key Cases Cited

  • Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (maximum penalty may be increased based on admitted facts under a guilty plea)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Godfrey
Court Name: District Court, M.D. Florida
Date Published: Mar 19, 2025
Docket Number: 6:24-cr-00273
Court Abbreviation: M.D. Fla.