midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
520 F. App'x 617
9th Cir.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Williams appeals a district court revocation of his supervised release, arguing the court lacked jurisdiction because his supervision term had expired before the revocation based on the alleged violation.
  • At the May 10, 2011 revocation hearing the district court assumed jurisdiction under a December 22, 2003 bench warrant under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(i).
  • This Court previously reversed and remanded for evidence on whether jurisdiction could rest on two periods of fugitive tolling due to deportation or fugitive status.
  • On remand the district court held Williams was a fugitive and tolled supervised release from December 1, 1999 to May 27, 2001 and from September 7, 2003 to March 9, 2009, thereby preserving jurisdiction to revoke.
  • The panel reverses, holds the first tolling period (Dec 1, 1999–May 27, 2001) did not occur because Williams properly remained subject to supervision despite deportation, and thus there was no jurisdiction for revocation absent tolling.
  • We vacate Williams’s sentence and reverse the district court’s judgment; the case is not resolved on other issues.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Jurisdiction to revoke supervised release Williams Government No jurisdiction absent fugitive tolling for Dec 1999–May 2001
Fugitive tolling for timing of deportation Williams Government First tolling period improperly found; deportation tolling not applicable for that interval
Burden of proof on tolling grounds Williams Government Government failed to prove tolling for the disputed period; burden on government
Standard of review for revocation jurisdiction — — Reviewed de novo; jurisdiction determined as a matter of law

Key Cases Cited

  • Mrvica v. Esperdy, 376 U.S. 560 (1964) (deportation and presence outside the U.S. tolling considerations)
  • Ignacio Juarez v. United States, 601 F.3d 885 (9th Cir. 2010) (burden to prove jurisdiction; tolling when deported and absconding rules)
  • United States v. Murguia-Oliveros, 421 F.3d 951 (9th Cir. 2005) (tolling during deportation/absence under supervision)
  • United States v. Sumner, 226 F.3d 1005 (9th Cir. 2000) (burden of establishing jurisdiction rests with the party asserting it)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Gerald Williams
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 5, 2013
Citations: 520 F. App'x 617; 12-50281
Docket Number: 12-50281
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
Log In