History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. George Thompson
690 F.3d 977
| 8th Cir. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • December 2008 government surveilled Thompson under a wiretap based on a 68-page affidavit alleging a multi-person illegal gambling enterprise; evidence included CWs, toll records, surveillance, and trash pulls; wiretap expanded to possible firearms, narcotics, extortion, visa fraud, and immigration offenses; searches of Thompson's and Baggett's properties followed the wiretap; November 2009 arrest of Tri Cam Le led to DeLeo's apartment search and storage-room discovery; two joint trials proceeded with multiple suppression and severance motions; Thompson ultimately challenged double jeopardy after a midtrial suppression ruling.
  • Evidence and trial posture included challenging suppression of wiretap, severance issues, and various evidentiary rulings; Court addressed Franks hearing request and necessity finding; Thompson and DeLeo separately challenged search and travel evidence; Baggett challenged sufficiency and joint trial dynamics.
  • Thompson and DeLeo sought suppression of wiretap evidence; motions denied; Thompson separately challenged prior arrest evidence and travel to China as flight; DeLeo challenged storage-room search; Thompson and Baggett faced jury verdicts with various convictions; Thompson's count five acquittal was reversed due to double jeopardy, resulting in vacating that conviction.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Wiretap suppression: probable cause and necessity Thompson, DeLeo: lack of probable cause; necessity not shown State failed to show five or more participants; necessity insufficient Probable cause and necessity upheld; wiretap admissible
Franks hearing necessity Omission of CWs' criminal histories; warrant invalid without Franks hearing Omissions not clearly critical; probable cause remained No Franks error; no abuse of discretion
Joinder and severance of Thompson and Baggett Joinder improper; severance required to avoid prejudice Joint trial proper due to overlap in conspiracy and evidence No abuse of discretion; joinder affirmed and severance denied
Evidence: Thompson's prior arrest and flight Prior arrest and China travel unlawfully admitted as improper character evidence and improper flight evidence Evidence admissible to show knowledge/intent and consciousness of guilt Admissible under proper purpose and limiting instructions; not error
Storage-room search outside DeLeo's apartment Search exceeded scope of warrant/consent Storage room appurtenant to apartment; lawful scope Search permissible; storage room within scope of warrant/consent

Key Cases Cited

  • Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983) (totality-of-the-circumstances probable cause standard)
  • United States v. Bennett, 563 F.2d 879 (7th Cir. 1977) (definition of five-or-more persons in gambling offenses excludes customers)
  • United States v. West, 589 F.3d 936 (8th Cir. 2009) (necessity in wiretap analyses supported by other techniques)
  • United States v. Daly, 535 F.2d 434 (7th Cir. 1976) (necessity not exhausted; common-sense standard)
  • United States v. Macklin, 902 F.2d 1320 (8th Cir. 1990) (necessity finding reviewable for clear error)
  • United States v. Liveoak, 377 F.3d 859 (8th Cir. 2004) (co-conspirator joinder depends on overarching scheme)
  • United States v. Pou, 953 F.2d 363 (8th Cir. 1992) (overlap in evidence supports joinder)
  • United States v. Hyles, 521 F.3d 946 (8th Cir. 2008) (knowledge of felon status; constructive possession framework)
  • Smith v. Massachusetts, 543 U.S. 462 (2005) (double jeopardy when midtrial acquittal reversed after defense rested)
  • Smalis v. Pennsylvania, 476 U.S. 140 (1986) (Double Jeopardy context in midtrial rulings)
  • United States v. Brekke, 97 F.3d 1043 (8th Cir. 1996) (de novo review of legal questions on appeal)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. George Thompson
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 28, 2012
Citation: 690 F.3d 977
Docket Number: 11-1765, 11-1813, 11-2124, 11-2604
Court Abbreviation: 8th Cir.