History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Gary Ermoian
752 F.3d 1165
| 9th Cir. | 2013
Read the full case

Background

  • CVGIT, a DOJ-funded task force including the FBI, investigated Hells Angels activity in Modesto, including Road Dog Cycle and Holloways.
  • A Watered-down Gang Intelligence Bulletin was circulated to local law enforcement to prevent leaks, describing surveillance of the Burn-Out Party and gang activity.
  • Ermoian and Johnson were charged with conspiracy to obstruct justice for actions taken after the bulletin’s distribution, including warnings and counter-surveillance.
  • Swanson, a deputy sheriff, notified Ermoian of photos from the Burn-Out Party, prompting Ermoian to warn Robert Holloway and cause efforts to dispose of contraband.
  • The district court instructed that an FBI investigation could be an official proceeding, and Ermoian/Johnson were convicted of obstructing justice based on that theory.
  • On appeal, the Ninth Circuit concluded that an FBI investigation is not an official proceeding under 18 U.S.C. § 1512, reversed the convictions, and remanded for acquittal and resentencing.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether an FBI investigation qualifies as an official proceeding under § 1512 Ermoian/Johnson contend FBI investigations are not official proceedings. Government argues FBI investigations are encompassed by official proceedings. FBI investigation not an official proceeding; convictions reversed and remanded.

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. Ramos, 537 F.3d 439 (5th Cir. 2008) (official proceeding meaning analyzed in context of ‘before a Federal Government agency’)
  • Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States, 544 U.S. 696 (U.S. 2005) (requires knowledge actions likely affect a judicial proceeding)
  • Robinson v. Shell Oil Co., 519 U.S. 337 (U.S. 1997) (plain meaning of statutory language in context)
  • United States v. Kelley, 36 F.3d 1118 (D.C. Cir. 1994) (assumed congressional purpose not dispositive; analysis lacking)
  • United States v. Gonzalez, 922 F.2d 1044 (2d Cir. 1991) (venue concerns for § 1512 interpretations; broader reading questioned)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Gary Ermoian
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Aug 28, 2013
Citation: 752 F.3d 1165
Docket Number: 11-10124, 11-10388
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.