History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Garrio
7:21-cr-00419
| S.D.N.Y. | Dec 27, 2024
Read the full case

Background

  • Brian Joseph Garrio, while employed as a truck driver, made violent threats against coworkers and an FBI special agent (Victim-1) using internal communications and social media.
  • Garrio was arrested on federal charges and pled guilty to one count of stalking under 18 U.S.C. § 2261A(2)(B) without a plea deal.
  • The government initially calculated his sentencing guidelines range as 41–51 months based on incomplete criminal history; the Probation Department later recalculated it as 46–57 months after finding additional convictions (Criminal History Category III).
  • The court sentenced Garrio to 51 months' imprisonment and three years’ supervised release.
  • Garrio appealed his sentence, which was affirmed by the Second Circuit, and then filed this motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 alleging ineffective assistance of counsel.

Issues

Issue Garrio's Argument Government's Argument Held
Guidelines Calculation Counsel failed to object to erroneous criminal history and upward adjustment. Calculation was correct; no objection warranted. Calculation was correct; no ineffective assistance.
Adjournment of Sentencing Counsel should have sought adjournment due to late government filing. Counsel reviewed submission; no prejudice to defendant. No ineffective assistance or prejudice.
Advice on Guilty Plea Counsel misinformed about plea consequences, sentence, and coerced plea. Garrio was properly informed in court; plea was voluntary. No evidence of misadvice or coercion; claim denied.
Motion to Withdraw Plea Counsel failed to move to withdraw involuntary plea. No grounds for withdrawal; motion would be frivolous. No duty to file frivolous motion; claim denied.

Key Cases Cited

  • Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) (establishing standard for ineffective assistance of counsel)
  • Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (1985) (ineffective assistance in the context of guilty pleas)
  • United States v. Gordon, 156 F.3d 376 (2d Cir. 1998) (standard for attorney's duty during plea negotiations)
  • United States v. Arteca, 411 F.3d 315 (2d Cir. 2005) (defendant's awareness of sentencing consequences in plea context)
  • United States v. Torres, 129 F.3d 710 (2d Cir. 1997) (weight given to statements during plea allocution)
  • United States v. Avellino, 136 F.3d 249 (2d Cir. 1998) (standard for withdrawal of guilty pleas)
  • United States v. Nersesian, 824 F.2d 1294 (2d Cir. 1987) (no duty to file frivolous motions as ineffective assistance)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Garrio
Court Name: District Court, S.D. New York
Date Published: Dec 27, 2024
Docket Number: 7:21-cr-00419
Court Abbreviation: S.D.N.Y.