History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Fred Hall
664 F. App'x 479
| 6th Cir. | 2016
Read the full case

Background

  • In 2014 Brad Bench reported burglary of his barn; missing items included a Charles Daly pump-action shotgun, its case and shells, Barska binoculars, and trail cameras.
  • Months later, Hall tried to sell a shotgun and three trail cameras to Joshua Helenhouse, loaned the gun for hunting, and the shotgun’s make/model/serial matched Bench’s stolen gun; 18 yellow shells matching Bench’s description were in the gun case.
  • A consent search of Hall’s girlfriend’s residence produced Hall’s papers, phones, three trail cameras, two pairs of binoculars (one Barska matching Bench’s), and other stolen items traced to nearby victims.
  • Hall pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm; probation recommended base offense level 14, plus enhancements including a 4-level increase under U.S.S.G. §2K2.1(b)(6)(B) for possession of a firearm in connection with another felony (burglary of the barn).
  • The district court found by a preponderance of the evidence that Hall was involved in the barn burglary, denied a reduction for acceptance of responsibility because Hall denied involvement in the theft, upwardly departed under U.S.S.G. §4A1.3 to Criminal History Category VI and increased offense level to arrive at a 96-month sentence.
  • Hall appealed, challenging (1) the application of the §2K2.1(b)(6)(B) enhancement, (2) denial of the acceptance-of-responsibility reduction, and (3) the substantive reasonableness of the upward departure and 96-month sentence; the Sixth Circuit affirmed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Application of §2K2.1(b)(6)(B) enhancement (firearm possessed in connection with another felony/theft) Government: preponderance of evidence showed Hall obtained the shotgun during Bench’s barn burglary (possession of matching gun, shells, binoculars, other stolen items) Hall: insufficient evidence he burglarized Bench’s barn; gun was given by a friend and he only tried to sell it Court: Affirmed — district court did not clearly err; circumstantial evidence made Hall’s involvement more likely than not and supported the 4-level enhancement
Denial of Guidelines reduction for acceptance of responsibility Hall: he admitted possession and pleaded guilty, so he merited the reduction Government/District Court: Hall continued to deny involvement in the related burglary/theft, which undercuts acceptance of responsibility Court: Affirmed — denial of reduction not clearly erroneous because court found Hall falsely disputed relevant conduct the court concluded true
Upward departure and substantive reasonableness of 96-month sentence Hall: 96 months is substantively unreasonable and excessive relative to Guidelines range (51–63 months) District Court: Criminal history category IV underrepresents his felony record (multiple prior felon-in-possession convictions, some aged out), warranting upward departure to CHC VI and additional incremental departure to reach 96 months for deterrence, public protection, and proportionality Court: Affirmed — sentence was neither arbitrary nor based on impermissible factors; court considered §3553(a) factors and reasonably structured the departure

Key Cases Cited

  • Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38 (2007) (establishes procedural/substantive reasonableness framework for sentencing review)
  • United States v. Pearce, 531 F.3d 374 (6th Cir. 2008) (reasonableness standard on appeal; presumption discussion)
  • United States v. Dupree, 323 F.3d 480 (6th Cir. 2003) (government’s burden to prove sentencing enhancements by a preponderance)
  • Williams v. Eau Claire Pub. Sch., 397 F.3d 441 (6th Cir. 2005) (definition of preponderance standard)
  • United States v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364 (1948) (clear error standard explained)
  • United States v. Cunningham, 669 F.3d 723 (6th Cir. 2012) (substantive-reasonableness factors and standards)
  • United States v. Kamper, 748 F.3d 728 (6th Cir.) (standard of review for acceptance-of-responsibility determinations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Fred Hall
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 16, 2016
Citation: 664 F. App'x 479
Docket Number: 15-2391
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir.