History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Frank Chatmon
2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 11644
| 4th Cir. | 2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Chatmon indicted for conspiracy to distribute crack cocaine and heroin; diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia and ruled incompetent to stand trial.
  • District court granted government motion to involuntarily medicate to restore competency under Sell v. United States framework.
  • District court found important government interest and asserted no less intrusive means were available, but provided minimal analysis of alternatives.
  • Chatmon was evaluated at Butner; December 9, 2011 report confirmed schizophrenia and noted potential efficacy of haloperidol decanoate.
  • Chatmon was moved from solitary RMU to an open unit, showing behavioral improvements before the competency hearing; no additional competency evaluation occurred.
  • The government filed the forced-mediation motion in February 2012; district court held a hearing August 29, 2012 and entered an order allowing involuntary medication,

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether third Sell factor was properly analyzed Chatmon Chatmon Vacated; remanded for proper less-intrusive analysis
Whether less intrusive options were adequately considered Chatmon urged group therapy/open-unit placement Government claimed no effective less intrusive means Remanded to consider less intrusive options and contempt-backed orders
Whether government interest qualified as 'important' under Sell Chatmon Government interests supported by serious crime charge Remanded; order vacated pending proper findings

Key Cases Cited

  • Sell v. United States, 539 U.S. 166 (U.S. 2003) (four-factor test for involuntary medication to restore competency)
  • United States v. White, 620 F.3d 401 (4th Cir. 2010) (drastic resort; liberty interests vs. government interests)
  • United States v. Bush, 585 F.3d 806 (4th Cir. 2009) (clear standard for Sell factors)
  • United States v. Evans, 404 F.3d 227 (4th Cir. 2005) (serious-crime criterion; maximum sentence governs seriousness)
  • United States v. Green, 532 F.3d 538 (6th Cir. 2008) (example of upholding involuntary medication under Sell)
  • United States v. Bradley, 417 F.3d 1107 (10th Cir. 2005) (example of considering less intrusive means under Sell)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Frank Chatmon
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 10, 2013
Citation: 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 11644
Docket Number: 12-4725
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.