United States v. Fincher
9:24-cr-00020
E.D. Tex.May 23, 2025Background
- William Charles Fincher, the defendant, was charged in the Eastern District of Texas (Case No. 9:24-CR-00020-MAC).
- On January 30, 2025, the defense requested a psychiatric evaluation to determine Fincher’s competency to stand trial.
- The motion was granted, and Fincher was evaluated by a licensed psychologist at a federal facility.
- The psychologist found Fincher competent, meaning he understood the proceedings and could assist in his own defense.
- At a competency hearing held on May 21, 2025, both the government and defense did not object to the report’s findings.
- The magistrate judge issued a report recommending that Fincher be found competent to stand trial and noted procedural requirements for objections.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Competency to Stand Trial | No objection to competency finding | Sought competency determination | Defendant is competent to stand trial |
| Exclusion of Speedy Trial Time | Not opposed | Not opposed | Exclude time from motion to adoption of recommendation |
| Standard for Determining Competency | Relies on psychological evaluation | Relies on psychological evaluation | Applies factual and rational understanding standard |
| Right to Object to Report | Parties can object | Parties can object | Parties must file written objections within fourteen days |
Key Cases Cited
- Dusky v. United States, 362 U.S. 402 (standard for competency to stand trial: defendant must have sufficient present ability to consult with his lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understanding and a rational and factual understanding of proceedings)