History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Emmanuel Asante
2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 5452
| 11th Cir. | 2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant Emmanuel Asante (Ghanaian national, unlawfully present) pled guilty to conspiracy to make false statements to a licensed firearms dealer and making false statements (18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 371, 924(a)(1)(A)) using a straw-buyer to obtain firearms he could not lawfully possess.
  • Co-defendant Johnny White purchased multiple guns—five to seven—for Asante, following Asante’s instructions to buy smaller-caliber weapons and to transport them for resale/profit.
  • Recorded calls showed Asante told White the guns had been hidden in cars shipped to Jamaica and that Asante’s brother and associates in Jamaica retrieved them.
  • At sentencing the district court applied two four-level enhancements under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1: (b)(5) for trafficking and (b)(6)(A) for exporting firearms, producing an offense level 21 and guideline range 46–57 months; the court imposed 46 months concurrent.
  • Asante challenged (1) sufficiency of evidence for each enhancement, (2) alleged double-counting from applying both enhancements, (3) substantive unreasonableness of the 46-month sentence, and (4) refusal to redact PSR allegations that he threatened the prosecutor and a magistrate judge.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Sufficiency for trafficking enhancement (U.S.S.G. §2K2.1(b)(5)) Asante: Government lacked proof he knew or had reason to believe transfers would result in unlawful possession/use Government: Circumstances known to Asante (straw buys, secretive transport, statements about smuggling to Jamaica for profit) show he knew or had reason to believe recipients would use/dispose unlawfully Affirmed: evidence of clandestine methods and intent to profit supported trafficking enhancement under the "circumstances known to defendant" test
Sufficiency for export enhancement (U.S.S.G. §2K2.1(b)(6)(A)) Asante: His recorded statements might be lies; insufficient proof firearms actually left U.S. or he intended export Government: Recorded calls where Asante described guns hidden in cars shipped to Jamaica and his brother retrieving them; district court credited statements Affirmed: district court credibility finding supported exporting enhancement
Double-counting by applying both enhancements Asante: Exporting and trafficking enhancements both punish same conduct (shipping guns abroad) Government: Each guideline targets different harms—trafficking targets transfer to someone who will unlawfully possess/use; exporting targets intent to move firearms out of U.S. irrespective of trafficking Affirmed: enhancements address conceptually separate harms and may be applied cumulatively absent contrary indication
PSR redaction of threats Asante: Threats to prosecutor/magistrate should have been redacted from PSR Government/District Court: Threats bear on defendant history/character; not within narrow exclusions of Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(d)(3) and 18 U.S.C. §3661 allows broad information Affirmed: court did not abuse discretion in refusing redaction; inclusion appropriate for Bureau of Prisons and sentencing considerations

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. Isaacson, 752 F.3d 1291 (11th Cir. 2014) (government must prove guideline facts by preponderance; legal standard for reviewing guideline application)
  • United States v. Barsoum, 763 F.3d 1321 (11th Cir. 2014) (deference to sentencing court credibility findings)
  • United States v. Flanders, 752 F.3d 1317 (11th Cir. 2014) (double-counting analysis; presumption that Commission intended cumulative application unless sections overlap)
  • United States v. Cubero, 754 F.3d 888 (11th Cir. 2014) (double-counting impermissible only when one guideline fully accounts for the harm addressed by another)
  • United States v. White, 663 F.3d 1207 (11th Cir. 2011) (distinguishing separate purposes of trafficking and exporting enhancements)
  • United States v. Baldwin, 774 F.3d 711 (11th Cir. 2014) (standard for reviewing substantive reasonableness of a sentence)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Emmanuel Asante
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Date Published: Apr 6, 2015
Citation: 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 5452
Docket Number: 13-15651
Court Abbreviation: 11th Cir.