91 F.4th 1361
10th Cir.2024Background:
- Kenneth Devereaux was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm and sentenced to 60 months in prison.
- In setting his sentence, the district court treated Devereaux’s prior conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(6) (assault resulting in serious bodily injury) as a “crime of violence,” which increased his base offense level under the guidelines.
- The court concluded that the prior assault conviction qualified as a crime of violence because it involved the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force.
- Devereaux, the government, and the probation officer all argued that § 113(a)(6) does not constitute a crime of violence for guideline purposes because it can be committed recklessly, not just intentionally.
- On appeal, both Devereaux and the government agreed the district court erred.
- The Tenth Circuit reviewed the standard de novo and ultimately vacated Devereaux’s sentence, remanding for resentencing.
Issues:
| Issue | Devereaux's Argument | Government's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether a conviction under § 113(a)(6), which may be committed intentionally or recklessly, qualifies as a "crime of violence" for sentencing purposes | § 113(a)(6) can be violated recklessly; reckless offenses don't qualify as crimes of violence under the guidelines | Agreed with Devereaux; reckless conduct does not meet the guidelines’ elements clause | No, § 113(a)(6) does not categorically require use of violent force and cannot be deemed a crime of violence |
| Whether § 113(a)(6) is divisible by mens rea, allowing use of the modified categorical approach | Not divisible; intentional and reckless assaults are means of violating a single offense | Agreed it is indivisible | Held that § 113(a)(6) is a single indivisible offense; only categorical approach applies |
| Whether the modified categorical approach should be applied to Devereaux’s prior conviction | Categorical approach only; no need to examine underlying facts | Agreed categorical approach controls | Categorical approach applies; modified categorical approach was error |
| Whether Devereaux's sentence should be vacated and remanded | Yes, with correction of base offense level | Agreed | Sentence vacated and remanded for resentencing |
Key Cases Cited
- Mathis v. United States, 579 U.S. 500 (2016) (Outlines categorical vs. modified categorical approach for prior convictions)
- Borden v. United States, 593 U.S. (2021) (Holding that crimes committed recklessly do not have as an element the use of physical force against another)
- United States v. Zunie, 444 F.3d 1230 (10th Cir. 2006) (Interpreted § 113(a)(6) as allowing conviction for intentional or reckless conduct)
- United States v. Mann, 899 F.3d 898 (10th Cir. 2018) (Lists elements of § 113(a)(6), overruled in part by Borden)
