History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Cooleridge Bell
404 U.S. App. D.C. 145
| D.C. Cir. | 2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Bell was convicted at trial of conspiring to possess and distribute at least one kilogram of PCP under 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A)(iv).
  • The district court sentenced Bell to 235 months’ imprisonment and five years of supervised release.
  • Bell appealed, challenging several trial and sentencing rulings; the court addressed only ineffective assistance of counsel and remanded the rest for other orders.
  • The safety valve under USSG § 5C1.2 allows a lower sentence if the defendant truthfully provides information about the offense, plus a two-point reduction under USSG § 2D1.1(b)(16).
  • Bell did not provide information to the government, and the district court found him ineligible for the safety valve; Bell claimed his counsel failed to tell him about the valve and failed to seek a continuance.
  • At sentencing Bell stated he had heard of the safety valve from prisoners, and his counsel conceded explaining that cooperation could help, but Bell claimed he had not been informed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Bell’s ineffective-assistance claim is colorable and remandable Bell Government Remand appropriate to develop the claim; not conclusive on the merits at this stage
Whether the record shows prejudice or entitlement to relief without a hearing Bell Government Record supports potential prejudice; not conclusively resolved; district court should develop record

Key Cases Cited

  • Massaro v. United States, 538 U.S. 500 (U.S. 2003) (district court should develop factual record for ineffective-assistance claims)
  • United States v. Rashad, 331 F.3d 908 (D.C. Cir. 2003) (colorable and previously unexplored claims may warrant remand)
  • United States v. Mohammed, 693 F.3d 192 (D.C. Cir. 2010) (remand appropriate where record does not conclusively resolve ineffectiveness)
  • United States v. Holland, 117 F.3d 589 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (evidentiary development in evaluating ineffective assistance)
  • Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (U.S. 1984) (prejudice standard for ineffective-assistance claims)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Cooleridge Bell
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Published: Mar 1, 2013
Citation: 404 U.S. App. D.C. 145
Docket Number: 11-3018
Court Abbreviation: D.C. Cir.