History
  • No items yet
midpage
908 F.3d 1141
8th Cir.
2018
Read the full case

Background

  • On July 12, 2015, Ferris Brings Plenty was killed in a violent group beating on the Pine Ridge Reservation; defendant Calmer Cottier was charged with second-degree murder (and aiding/abetting), conspiracy to commit assault, and solicitation to commit a crime of violence; a jury convicted on murder and conspiracy and acquitted on solicitation.
  • At trial, witnesses described Cottier participating in a coordinated attack: entering the yard, attacking Brings Plenty (including kicking), and others striking with a stick and machete; Brings Plenty died of blunt-force trauma.
  • Key contested factual points included whether Cottier threw a cinder block (testified by co-defendant Goings) and the import of plea factual-basis statements from cooperating co-defendants.
  • The government relied on aiding-and-abetting theory; malice may be established by reckless, wanton conduct showing awareness of a serious risk of death.
  • Trial evidence also included testimony about a preceding gang "training" sexual incident; the court admitted it but gave cautionary instructions and elicited clarifying testimony about age and consent.
  • Cottier was sentenced to 210 months; he appealed claiming insufficiency of evidence, erroneous jury instruction, prosecutorial vouching and improper admission of evidence (training), and Guidelines criminal-history calculation.

Issues

Issue Cottier's Argument Government's Argument Held
Sufficiency of evidence for aiding and abetting second-degree murder Goings’s testimony about the cinder block was unreliable; without it no reasonable jury could find Cottier guilty Multiple witnesses placed Cottier actively participating in a continuous, violent beating that caused death; credibility is for the jury Affirmed — viewing evidence in government’s favor, substantial evidence supports conviction
Jury instruction on aiding/abetting second-degree murder Instruction allowed conviction on mere intent to assault rather than intent to facilitate the murder Instruction required willful action with malice aforethought (including callous, wanton disregard), tying intent to the killing Affirmed — instruction correctly linked intent to the killing and tracked precedent
Prosecutorial vouching and admission of co-defendants’ factual-basis statements Prosecutor vouched for Goings; admission of plea factual-basis statements impermissibly bolstered witnesses Prosecutor’s statements were explanations of corroboration, not personal vouching; factual-basis statements were admitted with limiting instruction and with some defense consent; overwhelming evidence of guilt Affirmed — no reversible plain error; statements permissible and not prejudicial given context and evidence
Admission of testimony about gang "training" sexual incident Testimony was minimally relevant, highly prejudicial, and risked misleading the jury about rape/age allegations Evidence bore on gang mentality and presence of other conspirators; court mitigated prejudice with cautionary instructions and follow-up questioning Affirmed — admission was close call but not reversible; judge cured prejudice and any error was harmless given overwhelming evidence
Criminal-history calculation (juvenile adjudication points) Court erred in adding two points for 2006 juvenile adjudication Time in confinement after revocation exceeded 60 days and release was within five years; points properly assessed; district court nonetheless departed to Category I Affirmed — points proper; any error harmless because court departed to Category I

Key Cases Cited

  • Rosemond v. United States, 572 U.S. 65 (aider-and-abettor must intend to facilitate the specific charged offense)
  • United States v. Kelly, 436 F.3d 992 (standard for reviewing sufficiency of the evidence)
  • United States v. Borders, 829 F.3d 558 (aiding-and-abetting requires affirmative act and intent to facilitate the offense)
  • United States v. French, 719 F.3d 1002 (malice may be shown by reckless and wanton conduct)
  • United States v. Grey Bear, 828 F.2d 1286 (distinguishable precedent on beating cases where temporal sequence created alternative causation)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Calmer Cottier
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Date Published: Nov 16, 2018
Citations: 908 F.3d 1141; 17-3690
Docket Number: 17-3690
Court Abbreviation: 8th Cir.
Log In
    United States v. Calmer Cottier, 908 F.3d 1141