History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Brian Daniel
2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 25
8th Cir.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • On Feb. 14, 2013, KCMO officers observed a black Ford Explorer in a high-narcotics area and watched a hand-to-hand exchange consistent with a drug sale.
  • A license-plate check tied the vehicle to Brian Daniel, who matched the description of the person inside and had two outstanding warrants.
  • After officers approached, Daniel walked away and discarded a plastic baggie; officers handcuffed him and recovered the baggie, which tested positive for controlled substances.
  • Officers smelled fresh, unburnt marijuana coming from Daniel’s vehicle; they asked whether a weapon was in the car (Daniel said no) and then searched the vehicle.
  • The search produced a loaded .40 caliber handgun, ~450 grams of marijuana, and drug-trafficking paraphernalia; Daniel moved to suppress and lost in district court, then pleaded guilty conditionally to 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether officers had probable cause to search the vehicle without a warrant Daniel: officers lacked probable cause; the smell of marijuana was not established before search Government: observation of hand-to-hand transaction, discarded drugs, and smell of marijuana provided probable cause Court: Probable cause existed; search lawful

Key Cases Cited

  • Florida v. Harris, 133 S. Ct. 1050 (2013) (defines probable cause standard for searches)
  • United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798 (1982) (warrantless automobile searches permitted if probable cause to believe vehicle contains evidence)
  • United States v. Bearden, 780 F.3d 887 (8th Cir. 2015) (standard of review—de novo for legal conclusions, clear error for factual findings)
  • United States v. Brown, 634 F.3d 435 (8th Cir. 2011) (odor of marijuana can support probable cause to search a vehicle)
  • United States v. Davis, 569 F.3d 813 (8th Cir. 2009) (circumstances supporting vehicle search for drugs include observed transactions and odors)
  • United States v. Neumann, 183 F.3d 753 (8th Cir. 1999) (evidence of recent drug activity in vehicle supports probable cause)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Brian Daniel
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Date Published: Jan 5, 2016
Citation: 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 25
Docket Number: 15-1135
Court Abbreviation: 8th Cir.