History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Bradley
2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 14243
| 8th Cir. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Bradley was charged with conspiracy to distribute cocaine and distribution of cocaine in Rapid City, SD, in 2008.
  • Conspiracy evidence linked Bradley to Potratz and Stockman, with Shelton as a cocaine customer via Potratz.
  • Potratz delivered weekly half-ounce quantities to Bradley; Bradley also supplied his own customers.
  • Shelton testified Bradley could obtain cocaine from Stockman in Stockman’s absence; Wiseley corroborated purchases from Bradley.
  • PSR apportioned Bradley 241.4 grams of cocaine as his relevant conduct, yielding base offense level 20.
  • District court affirmed the PSR, convicted Bradley, and sentenced him to 60 months concurrent with state sentence.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Sufficiency of evidence for conspiracy and distribution Bradley (Bradley) asserts insufficient evidence. Bradley contends witnesses were unreliable/cooperation-based. Evidence sufficient; jury credibility resolved by jury; not clearly erroneous.
Drug quantity attributed for sentencing Bradley argues 241.4 g overstated; seeks 100–200 g. District court properly used trial testimony to establish period and amounts. District court’s quantity finding supported by record; affirmed.
Minor participant reduction Bradley seeks 2-level minor participant reduction. Bradley was deeply involved; not a minor participant. No error; Bradley not entitled to minor participant adjustment.

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. Malloy, 614 F.3d 852 (8th Cir. 2010) (credibility of cooperating-witness testimony deferential on appeal)
  • United States v. Hodge, 594 F.3d 614 (8th Cir. 2010) (jury credibility determinations deferrable; no acquittal based on inconsistencies)
  • United States v. Ojeda-Estrada, 577 F.3d 871 (8th Cir. 2009) (elements of conspiracy and knowledge required; minor role not needed for conviction)
  • United States v. Jiminez, 487 F.3d 1140 (8th Cir. 2007) (conspiracy elements; membership can be established by substantial participation)
  • United States v. Rodriguez, 484 F.3d 1006 (8th Cir. 2007) (drug quantity can include related transactions within same course of conduct)
  • United States v. Banks, 494 F.3d 681 (8th Cir. 2007) (support for using non-direct seizure data in quantity calculations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Bradley
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Date Published: Jul 12, 2011
Citation: 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 14243
Docket Number: 10-2697
Court Abbreviation: 8th Cir.