United States v. Baker
713 F.3d 558
10th Cir.2013Background
- Baker was convicted in the District of Kansas on seven counts of robbery affecting commerce, use of a firearm in relation to a crime of violence, and being a felon in possession of a firearm.
- Police installed a GPS device on a car linked to Baker’s girlfriend after surveillance footage suggested the robbers used that car.
- GPS monitoring linked the car to a robbery in Overland Park, leading to Baker’s March 3, 2011 arrest and seizure of cash and a loaded Glock .40 handgun from the car.
- The handgun belonged to Enjoli Collier, who testified she kept it in her car and that Baker had access to her home during February 2011.
- For each robbery, witnesses testified the gun resembled Collier’s gun, and a cell-tower call near Collier’s home placed a Baker associate in the area.
- Baker argued the GPS evidence violated the Fourth Amendment, and challenged sufficiency of evidence on eight firearm-related counts.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Waiver of Fourth Amendment GPS claim | Baker failed to raise suppression pretrial; waiver applies. | Jones should apply; good cause under Rule 12(e) permits review. | Claim waived; no plain-error relief. |
| Sufficiency of evidence for gun counts | Evidence showed Baker possessed the gun used in robberies after February 14 and plausibly before then. | No direct proof Baker possessed Collier’s gun before February 14. | Evidence sufficient; reasonable juror could find possession. |
Key Cases Cited
- United States v. Burke, 633 F.3d 984 (10th Cir. 2011) (Rule 12(e) waiver prevents first-appeal suppression challenges)
- Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314 (1987) (retroactivity of new rules with waiver considerations is limited)
- Powell v. Nevada, 511 U.S. 79 (1994) (Griffith retroactivity applied; nuances on remand issues)
- United States v. Jones, 132 S. Ct. 945 (2012) (GPS attachment constitutes a search under Fourth Amendment)
- United States v. Maynard, 615 F.3d 544 (D.C. Cir. 2010) (pretrial suppression arguments may be raised before trial)
