midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
111 F.4th 105
D.C. Cir.
2024
Read the full case

Background

  • Five police officers were conducting a firearm interdiction patrol in Southeast Washington, D.C., when they observed Antonio Malachi Bryant.
  • Officers saw Bryant walking away from two individuals, adjusting his waistband, and looking over his shoulder—behavior they found suspicious.
  • When approached, officers observed a bulge on Bryant's person, leading them to stop and search him, discovering a firearm.
  • Bryant was charged as a felon in possession of a firearm under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).
  • Bryant moved to suppress the gun as the product of an unconstitutional seizure under the Fourth Amendment, arguing he was seized before the officers had reasonable suspicion.
  • The District Court denied the motion to suppress, finding reasonable suspicion existed at the time of seizure; Bryant appealed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Timing of Seizure Bryant was seized before officers saw the bulge. Seizure occurred after officer observed the bulge. Seizure happened after reasonable suspicion.
Constitutionality of the Seizure Seizure violated Fourth Amendment without pre-existing RAS. Officers had RAS once bulge was observed. Seizure was constitutional.
Blocking as Indication of Seizure Movement was blocked, creating a show of authority = seizure. Officers did not fully block Bryant until seeing bulge. Path was not blocked until later.
Effect of Multiple Officers/Presence Multiple officers approaching at night equals a seizure. Routine officer approach does not create a seizure. Multiple officers did not create a seizure.

Key Cases Cited

  • Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (stop and frisk permitted if officers have reasonable suspicion of criminal activity)
  • California v. Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621 (seizure occurs when law enforcement applies physical force or show of authority)
  • Brendlin v. California, 551 U.S. 249 (standard for when a person is "seized" under the Fourth Amendment)
  • Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491 (police may approach individuals in public without triggering a Fourth Amendment seizure)
  • United States v. Castle, 825 F.3d 625 (standards for when an encounter turns into a seizure and for reasonable suspicion)
  • Gomez v. Turner, 672 F.2d 134 (mere questioning by police does not constitute a seizure)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Antonio Bryant
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Published: Aug 6, 2024
Citations: 111 F.4th 105; 21-3064
Docket Number: 21-3064
Court Abbreviation: D.C. Cir.
Log In
    United States v. Antonio Bryant, 111 F.4th 105