History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Andrew Cunningham, III
705 F. App'x 906
| 11th Cir. | 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Deputies responded to reports of a broken window and gunshots in Indiantown, Florida involving Cunningham.
  • Cunningham was later identified as the shooting victim at a hospital and his mother allowed a home search.
  • Deputies found a weighted jacket with a firearm in Cunningham’s bedroom during a preliminary search; a warrant was obtained based on an affidavit.
  • Cunningham was convicted of possession of a firearm by a felon and sentenced to 120 months; he appealed.
  • The district court gave a modified Allen charge after the jury indicated it could not reach a verdict; the jury soon returned a guilty verdict.
  • The motion to suppress was denied after finding consent voluntary and the warrant supported by probable cause; Rule 17(b) subpoena request was denied.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Allen charge coercion risk Cunningham argues the modified Allen charge was coercive Cunningham treats any Allen charge as coercive under circumstances No abuse of discretion; charge proper under precedent
Voluntariness of consent Consent obtained via deceit; not voluntary Consent was voluntary under totality of circumstances Consent voluntary; suppression denied on this basis
Probable cause for the warrant Affidavit relied on unlawful consent search Consent was voluntary, supporting probable cause; good-faith alternative Warrant supported by probable cause; suppression upheld defendant's challenge rejected
Rule 17(b) subpoena denial Judge who signed the warrant should be subpoenaed to attest authenticity Subpoena necessary for adequate defense District court did not abuse discretion; Rule 17(b) motion denied

Key Cases Cited

  • Allen v. United States, 164 U.S. 492 (1896) (rules governing Allen charge; standard for admissibility)
  • United States v. Bush, 727 F.3d 1308 (11th Cir. 2013) (modified Allen charge approved in pattern instructions)
  • United States v. Woodard, 531 F.3d 1352 (11th Cir. 2008) (abuse of discretion standard for Allen charge)
  • Sanders v. United States, 415 F.2d 621 (5th Cir. 1969) (Allen charge–volunteered split not controlling on coercion)
  • Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573 (1980) (home entry without warrant presumptively unreasonable)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Andrew Cunningham, III
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Date Published: Aug 25, 2017
Citation: 705 F. App'x 906
Docket Number: 16-14153 Non-Argument Calendar
Court Abbreviation: 11th Cir.