History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Markusen
143 F. Supp. 3d 877
D. Minnesota
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Markusen is the sole owner/CEO of Archer Advisors LLC, which managed two private funds and charged management, performance, and reimbursed expenses.
  • Cope, Archer’s former COO, was an Archer insider and unregistered; Archer paid him as if for independent research, masking his role.
  • From 2008–2013 Archer reimbursed nearly $500,000 for ‘research’ expenses that were not paid to Cope or others, funding Markusen’s use of funds.
  • Archer used soft dollars to divert funds to Cope and others, disguising payments as research fees and kickbacks.
  • Beginning in 2010–2013, Markusen and Cope engaged in marking the close of CYBE to inflate fund performance and fees.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Liability under 10b-5 and 17(a) for fake research expenses Markusen/Archer engaged in fraud via fake research expenses. Defendants contest misrepresentation/scienter requirements. Liability established for both under disclosure and scheme provisions.
Control-person liability under 20(a) Markusen controlled Archer and caused the violations. No separate liability argued for control person. Markusen liable as Archer’s controlling person.
Manipulative trading: marking the close Markusen/Archer manipulated CYBE closing prices to inflate returns. Challenge to the characterization of closing trades as manipulation. Violation established; marking the close found fraudulent.
Remedies: disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil penalties Disgorgement of ill-gotten gains plus interest and penalties appropriate. Challenge to magnitude and ability to pay. Disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and $100,000 penalties awarded; injunction issued.
Injunction and continuation of litigation posture Permanent injunction necessary to prevent future violations. Not addressed; default status limits defenses. Permanent injunction granted; judgment withheld pending Cope resolution.

Key Cases Cited

  • Santa Fe Indus., Inc. v. Green, 430 U.S. 462 (U.S. (1977)) (definition of market manipulation under 10b-5)
  • Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders, 564 U.S. 135 (U.S. 2011) (ultimate authority over statements; misstatements liability)
  • SEC v. Montana, 464 F. Supp. 2d 772 (S.D. Ind. 2006) (imputation of scienter from control and pattern of deception)
  • Pfanenstiel Architects, Inc. v. Chouteau Petroleum Co., 978 F.2d 430 (8th Cir. 1992) (stay of damages when co-defendants present; avoid inconsistency)
  • SEC v. Comserv Corp., 908 F.2d 1407 (8th Cir. 1990) (standard for permanent injunction in securities actions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Markusen
Court Name: District Court, D. Minnesota
Date Published: Nov 10, 2015
Citation: 143 F. Supp. 3d 877
Docket Number: Civil File No. 14-3395 (MJD/TNL)
Court Abbreviation: D. Minnesota