United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Markusen
143 F. Supp. 3d 877
D. Minnesota2015Background
- Markusen is the sole owner/CEO of Archer Advisors LLC, which managed two private funds and charged management, performance, and reimbursed expenses.
- Cope, Archer’s former COO, was an Archer insider and unregistered; Archer paid him as if for independent research, masking his role.
- From 2008–2013 Archer reimbursed nearly $500,000 for ‘research’ expenses that were not paid to Cope or others, funding Markusen’s use of funds.
- Archer used soft dollars to divert funds to Cope and others, disguising payments as research fees and kickbacks.
- Beginning in 2010–2013, Markusen and Cope engaged in marking the close of CYBE to inflate fund performance and fees.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liability under 10b-5 and 17(a) for fake research expenses | Markusen/Archer engaged in fraud via fake research expenses. | Defendants contest misrepresentation/scienter requirements. | Liability established for both under disclosure and scheme provisions. |
| Control-person liability under 20(a) | Markusen controlled Archer and caused the violations. | No separate liability argued for control person. | Markusen liable as Archer’s controlling person. |
| Manipulative trading: marking the close | Markusen/Archer manipulated CYBE closing prices to inflate returns. | Challenge to the characterization of closing trades as manipulation. | Violation established; marking the close found fraudulent. |
| Remedies: disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil penalties | Disgorgement of ill-gotten gains plus interest and penalties appropriate. | Challenge to magnitude and ability to pay. | Disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and $100,000 penalties awarded; injunction issued. |
| Injunction and continuation of litigation posture | Permanent injunction necessary to prevent future violations. | Not addressed; default status limits defenses. | Permanent injunction granted; judgment withheld pending Cope resolution. |
Key Cases Cited
- Santa Fe Indus., Inc. v. Green, 430 U.S. 462 (U.S. (1977)) (definition of market manipulation under 10b-5)
- Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders, 564 U.S. 135 (U.S. 2011) (ultimate authority over statements; misstatements liability)
- SEC v. Montana, 464 F. Supp. 2d 772 (S.D. Ind. 2006) (imputation of scienter from control and pattern of deception)
- Pfanenstiel Architects, Inc. v. Chouteau Petroleum Co., 978 F.2d 430 (8th Cir. 1992) (stay of damages when co-defendants present; avoid inconsistency)
- SEC v. Comserv Corp., 908 F.2d 1407 (8th Cir. 1990) (standard for permanent injunction in securities actions)
