History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States Ex Rel. Dunn v. North Memorial Health Care
739 F.3d 417
8th Cir.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Dunn filed a qui tam action under the FCA alleging North Memorial submitted fraudulent CMS claims for outpatient cardiac and pulmonary rehabilitation without proper physician supervision.
  • Medicare requires supervision by a physician or nonphysician practitioner for these services, and providers must submit reimbursement claims to CMS.
  • From 1996 to 2008 Dunn was Administrator for Cardiovascular Consultants, who provided services at North Memorial, and he alleged ongoing noncompliance.
  • Dunn claimed North Memorial continued the noncompliant practices and submitted false claims, resulting in approximately two million dollars paid by the government.
  • The district court dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6); the Eighth Circuit affirmed on the alternative ground that the complaint failed Rule 9(b).
  • The FCA attaches liability to the claim for payment, and Rule 9(b) requires particularity, including time, place, content, and participants of fraud.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Rule 9(b) adequacy of fraud pleading Dunn asserts systemic fraudulent billing and supervision failures. North Memorial contends no specific false claims were pleaded. Affirmed; insufficient Rule 9(b) particularity.

Key Cases Cited

  • United States ex rel. Vigil v. Nelnet, Inc., 639 F.3d 791 (8th Cir. 2011) (FCA protects the federal fisc by focusing on false claims for payment)
  • In re Baycol Prods. Litig., 732 F.3d 869 (8th Cir. 2013) (liability attaches to the claim for payment, not underlying conduct)
  • Costner v. URS Consultants, Inc., 153 F.3d 667 (8th Cir. 1998) (central principle that FCA is an anti-fraud statute requiring pleading)
  • United States ex rel. Joshi v. St. Luke’s Hosp., Inc., 441 F.3d 552 (8th Cir. 2006) (relator must allege specific fraudulent claims with particularity)
  • Phipps v. FDIC, 417 F.3d 1006 (8th Cir. 2005) (well-established rule that failure to provide specifics defeats 9(b))
  • Ketroser v. Mayo Found., 729 F.3d 825 (8th Cir. 2013) (systematic fraud pleading requires representative examples)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States Ex Rel. Dunn v. North Memorial Health Care
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Date Published: Jan 9, 2014
Citation: 739 F.3d 417
Docket Number: 13-1099
Court Abbreviation: 8th Cir.