History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States Blood Bank, Inc. v. Agency for Workforce Innovation
85 So. 3d 1139
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Predecessor USBB, a Delaware corporation, merged into USBB Acquisition Corp. and became successor USBB, a Florida corporation.
  • Florida Department of Revenue concluded there was common ownership/management/control at the time of the transfer, leading to a higher unemployment tax rate.
  • Agency for Workforce Innovation affirmed the Department’s increased unemployment compensation rate.
  • 66 employees were transferred from predecessor USBB to successor USBB.
  • Sotolongo served as director of both corporations, and corporate records show common management; the Special Deputy relied on these facts in concluding common ownership/management.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether there was common ownership/management/control at the transfer Sotolongo's dual-directorship plus records show common management Special Deputy’s findings supported by corporate records and filings Yes; there was common management and the transfer triggered 443.131(g) consequences
Whether the transfer violated 443.131(g) or its purposes Not argued explicitly in the record here; focus on evidence of control Agency determined substantial purpose to reduce contributions; rates were increased Agency findings supported; transfer tied to increased rate under law

Key Cases Cited

  • I.B., ex rel. R.B. v. State, Agency for Health Care Admin., 87 So.3d 6 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (competent evidence review for agency findings; de novo on law)
  • Dorcely v. State Dep’t of Bus. & Prof. Regulation, 22 So.3d 834 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (de novo review of agency conclusions of law)
  • Palm Beach Cnty. Canvassing Bd. v. Harris, 772 So.2d 1273 (Fla. 2000) (deference to agency statutory interpretation; findings of fact reviewed for substantial evidence)
  • Salinas v. E. Aero Marine, 908 So.2d 1169 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (competent, substantial evidence standard for agency findings)
  • Maynard v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 609 So.2d 143 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (standards for reviewing unemployment appeals decisions)
  • His Kids Daycare v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 904 So.2d 477 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (fact-finder credibility and weighing of evidence)
  • I.B., ex rel. R.B. v. State, Agency for Health Care Admin., 87 So.3d 6 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (agency findings subject to competent, substantial evidence; law de novo)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: United States Blood Bank, Inc. v. Agency for Workforce Innovation
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Mar 21, 2012
Citation: 85 So. 3d 1139
Docket Number: No. 3D11-1705
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.