Ullom v. Miller
227 W. Va. 1
| W. Va. | 2010Background
- arrested for driving under the influence on June 26, 2006; DMV revoked driving privileges and administrative hearing held Sept. 29, 2006; trooper Buskirk observed Ullom’s car parked off the road with parking lights on, engine off, no sign of distress; he conducted a road-safety contact, then lawfully obtained field sobriety tests and an arrest for DUI; a secondary breath test was inconclusive; the administrative record included the trooper’s Statement of Arresting Officer triggering the revocation proceeding; the circuit court later reversed the DMV order but this Court reversed the circuit court and reinstated the DMV revocation; the acquittal in related criminal charges occurred after the administrative hearing.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Was the initial encounter constitutionally permissible under community caretaker/Fourth Amendment principles? | Ullom: encounter was permissible as a community caretaker action. | Miller: encounter could be framed as a valid caretaker intrusion to ensure safety. | Yes; initial encounter admissible under community caretaker doctrine. |
| Was the continuation of detention after the initial encounter valid under Terry/Stuart? | Ullom: continued detention lacked reasonable suspicion. | Miller: continued detention supported by reasonable suspicion given odor, eyes, slurred speech, and unsteady movements. | Yes; continued detention justified under Terry/Stuart. |
| Did the circuit court err in considering Ullom’s subsequent criminal acquittal in the administrative review? | Ullom: acquittal occurred after hearing; not part of administrative record. | Miller: weight of related criminal results must be considered under Choma. | Court erred; acquittal cannot be considered in this case. |
Key Cases Cited
- Cady v. Dombrowski, 413 U.S. 433 (1973) (recognition of community caretaking functions in vehicle regulation context)
- State v. Ladd, 210 W.Va. 413 (2001) (Fourth Amendment exceptions balancing privacy and safety; Terry-like analysis)
- State v. Moore, 165 W.Va. 837 (1980) (warrantless searches with limited exceptions; general rule and exceptions)
- State v. Duvernoy, 156 W.Va. 578 (1973) ( Fourth Amendment exceptions and scope of community/temporary encounters)
- State v. Bookheimer, 221 W.Va. 720 (2007) (recognition of community safety role in searches/seizures)
- State v. Kendall, 219 W.Va. 686 (2006) (explanation of permissible warrantless encounters and evidentiary standards)
- State v. Choma v. West Virginia Division of Motor Vehicles, 210 W.Va. 256 (2001) (administrative should give substantial weight to related criminal proceedings; acquittal timing considered)
