midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
2012 Ohio 3703
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Appellant Deborah Bartholomew signed an adjustable-rate note secured by a mortgage with MERS as nominee in 2005.
  • In 2009 the mortgage was assigned to U.S. Bank National Association as trustee for a securitized trust.
  • U.S. Bank filed a foreclosure action in 2009 for alleged loan default and sought about $129,000 plus interest.
  • In 2010 Bartholomew signed a Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) trial-period agreement; a permanent modification offer followed later, which she declined.
  • The trial court granted summary judgment for U.S. Bank in 2011; it also struck and denied Bartholomew’s motions to enforce a purported settlement and remanded the damages assessment for a credit review due to post‑January 1, 2009 payments.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Enforceability of settlement without a hearing No final settlement existed; enforcement appropriate only if final agreement reached There was a binding settlement enforceable without a hearing No error; no final enforceable settlement shown
Denial of motion to enforce the settlement Court should enforce settlement if final and binding No enforceable settlement existed; hearing not required without final agreement upheld the denial of enforcement on the lack of a final agreement
Summary judgment on foreclosure Evidence supports debt calculation and foreclosure relief Disputed amount due; summary judgment improper until damages corrected Summary judgment affirmed for foreclosure; damages remanded for re-determination due to post‑2009 payments

Key Cases Cited

  • Continental W. Condominium Unit Owners Ass'n v. Howard E. Ferguson, Inc., 74 Ohio St.3d 501 (Ohio 1996) (standard for reviewing settlement/breach and related issues)
  • Smiddy v. The Wedding Party, Inc., 30 Ohio St.3d 35 (Ohio 1987) (de novo review on summary judgment evidentiary standards)
  • Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (U.S. 1987) (burden on moving party to show absence of material facts)
  • Dresher v. Burt, 75 Ohio St.3d 280 (Ohio 1996) (summary-judgment standard in Ohio; Dresher rule)
  • Temple v. Wean United, Inc., 50 Ohio St.2d 317 (Ohio 1977) (conditions for summary judgment under Civ.R. 56)
  • Williams v. First United Church of Christ, 37 Ohio St.2d 150 (Ohio 1974) (view evidence in light most favorable to nonmoving party)
  • Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co., 77 Ohio St.3d 102 (Ohio 1996) (de novo/appellate review of summary judgment)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: U.S. Natl. Bank Assn., N.A. v. Bartholomew
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Aug 13, 2012
Citations: 2012 Ohio 3703; 2011CA00151
Docket Number: 2011CA00151
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In