History
  • No items yet
midpage
U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Sawyer
2014 ME 81
| Me. | 2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Sawyers defaulted on their mortgage in 2009 and entered a trial modification; payments were later increased above predelinquency levels, causing renewed distress.
  • Foreclosure filed in 2012 while Chase served as loan servicer; after filing, Sawyers sought modification and pursued mediations with multiple servicers.
  • First mediation (Oct 2012): Chase requested duplicate documents and promised a decision within 30 days but did not decide.
  • Second mediation (Feb 2013): Chase again requested documents and promised response by Apr 22, but no timely decision or response.
  • Third mediation (May 2013): Chase promised a June 28 decision; after missed deadline, the loan was transferred to SPS and no modification was offered.
  • Show cause hearing (Sept 24, 2013): SPS appeared late with a speculative proprietary modification and no evidentiary support; court dismissed the complaint with prejudice.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether dismissal with prejudice was proper sanction under Rule 93(j). Bank argues the sanction is excessive and lacks evidence of bad faith or prejudice. Sawyers assert sanctions were appropriate given mediation failures and delays. Yes; sanctions upheld as proper discretionary response to failure to negotiate in good faith.
Whether there was evidence of bad faith or prejudice to the Sawyers. Bank contends no bad faith or prejudice evidenced. Sawyers argue Bank’s delays caused prejudice and distress. Bank’s lack of good faith could be inferred; Sawyers were prejudiced by delays and added costs.

Key Cases Cited

  • Bartlett v. Bartlett, 87 A.3d 741 (2014 ME 37) (sanction of dismissal with prejudice upheld for failure to negotiate in good faith)
  • Murphy v. Bartlett, 86 A.3d 610 (2014 ME 13) (sanctions may be imposed based on lack of good faith even without willful fault)
  • Pelletier v. Pelletier, 597 A.2d 60 (Me.1991) (warning and opportunity to be heard support sanctions for lack of preparedness)
  • First Franklin Fin. Corp. v. Gardner, 60 A.3d 1262 (2013 ME 3) (emphasizes need for good faith participation in mediation)
  • Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Bartlett, 87 A.3d 741 (2014 ME 37) (confirms discretionary sanctions for lender’s mediation failures)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Sawyer
Court Name: Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Date Published: Jun 24, 2014
Citation: 2014 ME 81
Docket Number: Docket No. Cum-13-472
Court Abbreviation: Me.