History
  • No items yet
midpage
11 A.3d 824
Md.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Artist was shot by multiple gunmen; 9mm and .40 ammo found at scene.
  • Donte Tyner and Tavon Tyner were convicted of first-degree murder and related offenses after a nine-day trial.
  • Key eyewitness McCullough, cooperating with the State, recanted initial statements and provided new account.
  • Miha Brown, 16, identified McCullough as van driver and Tavon as shooter from photo arrays.
  • Detective Bradley testified about McCullough’s cooperation agreement to tell the truth, prompting defense objections.
  • Issue-focused rulings centered on whether Bradley’s testimony improperly bolstered McCullough and whether such error was reversible under Bohnert and Hunter.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Detective Bradley’s testimony improperly bolstered McCullough’s credibility Tyner argues it improperly vouched for McCullough Tyner contends this bolstering was permissible contextually No reversible error; context supported admissibility
Whether admitting cooperation-agreement testimony violated Bohnert/Hunter principles Bohnert/Hunter require strike of credibility implications Context showed it explained the agreement, not credibility of others Not error as to law; admissible explanation of cooperation agreement
Whether one co-defendant’s objection should bind the other on appeal If one co-defendant objects, the issue should support both Objections are case-specific; not necessarily transferable Not reached; not necessary to decide given other holdings

Key Cases Cited

  • Bohnert v. State, 312 Md. 266 (Md. 1988) (prohibits bolstering a witness's credibility with another’s opinion; error when admitting such testimony)
  • Hunter v. State, 397 Md. 583 (Md. 2007) (prohibits asking jurors to judge credibility of police witnesses against defendant)
  • Crawford v. State, 285 Md. 431, 404 A.2d 244 (Md. 1979) (precludes testimony that expresses disbelief of the defendant’s story as to credibility)
  • Merzbacher v. State, 346 Md. 391, 697 A.2d 432 (Md. 1997) (relevancy and discretion standards for evidentiary rulings; general principle cited)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Tyner v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Maryland
Date Published: Jan 21, 2011
Citations: 11 A.3d 824; 417 Md. 611; 2011 Md. LEXIS 5; No. 51
Docket Number: No. 51
Court Abbreviation: Md.
Log In
    Tyner v. State, 11 A.3d 824