History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tyner v. State
313 Ga. App. 557
| Ga. Ct. App. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Tyner was convicted by a jury of felony theft by shoplifting (Count 2) for June 12, 2010 conduct; Count 1 (June 5) was acquitted.
  • The store loss-prevention officer observed Tyner on surveillance on both dates, noting concealment on June 12.
  • A security guard on duty on June 12 stopped Tyner and recovered the concealed merchandise—purse and four wallets—valued over $1,000.
  • Tyner was indicted on two counts; trial evidence included officer testimony and police arrest testimony.
  • The trial court sentenced Tyner to ten years, and she later obtained new counsel and moved for a new trial on various grounds, including ineffective assistance.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Sufficiency of the evidence for Count 2 Tyner contends no merchandise was taken or concealed. Tyner argues absence of possession or concealment defeats shoplifting. Sufficient evidence supported conviction.
Admission of surveillance narration and photographs Narration and photos bolstered the State’s case. Evidence was improper bolstering or prejudicially cumulative. No reversible error; testimony and photos were permissible and not prejudicial.
Continuance to obtain new counsel Needed additional time to secure new counsel. Trial court abused its discretion in denying last-minute continuance. No abuse of discretion; denial was within trial court’s discretion.
Recidivist sentencing under OCGA § 17-10-7 No error; sentence fell within statutory limits and recidivist statute not invoked.
Ineffective assistance of counsel claims Counsel failed in multiple respects (exculpatory witness, objections, mitigation). Counsel’s actions were strategic; no prejudice shown. No reversible error; cumulative analysis shows no reasonable likelihood of different outcome.

Key Cases Cited

  • Goolsby v. State, 299 Ga. App. 330 (Ga. App. 2009) (review of sufficiency and preservation of error in trial)
  • Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (Supreme Court 1979) (standard for sufficiency of evidence in criminal cases)
  • English v. State, 301 Ga. App. 842 (Ga. App. 2010) (reference on evidentiary rulings and testimony)
  • Joiner v. State, 299 Ga. App. 300 (Ga. App. 2009) (limits on expanding enumerations of error; procedural)
  • Miller v. State, 273 Ga. 831 (Ga. 2001) (principles on sufficiency and prosecutorial argument)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Tyner v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jan 13, 2012
Citation: 313 Ga. App. 557
Docket Number: A11A1520
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.