History
  • No items yet
midpage
Turner Const. Co., Inc. v. United States
2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 14370
| Fed. Cir. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Army awarded Turner contract for Fort Benning hospital; two rivals protested to GAO alleging OCIs; GAO recommended re-procurement without Turner participation; Army followed GAO recommendation and terminated Turner; Turner sued in the Court of Federal Claims seeking reinstatement; CO conducted post-award OCI investigation that found no significant OCI.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether GAO decision lacked rational basis Harbert-Gorrie contends GAO irrational Harbert-Gorrie argues GAO properly reviewed CO findings GAO decision irrational; reversed in Turner I
Whether Court properly used Honeywell standard Court should defer to GAO GAO's rationality review governs Court applied Honeywell standard and avoided de novo review
Whether post-award investigation could support rationality CO's post-award analysis should be given weight Post-award and pre-award analyses both valid Post-award investigation properly considered under FAR § 9.504(a)
Whether hard facts requirement was misapplied GAO relied on suspicious inferences CO identified hard facts showing no competitive utility Hard facts requirement correctly applied; no OCI found
Whether reinstatement was proper remedy under Tucker Act Remand or re-procurement preferable Reinstatement appropriate to restore status quo Court’s reinstatement remedy affirmed; properly within Tucker Act equitable powers

Key Cases Cited

  • PAI Corp. v. United States, 614 F.3d 1347 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (rational basis review for bid protests; deference to CO findings)
  • Honeywell, Inc. v. United States, 870 F.2d 644 (Fed. Cir. 1989) (agency decision must be rational; not substitute judgment)
  • Axiom Res. Mgmt. v. United States, 564 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (discretion in OCI identification; FACT-specific inquiries)
  • R&W Flammann GmbH v. United States, 339 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2003) (review standard for bid protests; deference to agency)
  • C.A.C.I., Inc. v. United States, 719 F.2d 1567 (Fed. Cir. 1983) (hard facts vs. mere suspicion in OCI context)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Turner Const. Co., Inc. v. United States
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Date Published: Jul 14, 2011
Citation: 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 14370
Docket Number: 2010-5146
Court Abbreviation: Fed. Cir.