midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
2012 Va. Cir. LEXIS 190
Surry Cir. Ct.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Truelove, an eleven-year-old, injured Jan 17, 2010 at Chippokes Plantation State Park from an unsecured bunk bed.
  • May 3, 2010, Truelove sent VTCA notice to Division of Risk Management stating time/place but not the liable agency.
  • Aug 18, 2011, Truelove filed suit; Commonwealth answered with defenses of defective notice and sovereign immunity; no amendment by Truelove.
  • Mar 7, 2012, court heard arguments and issued decision on notice and immunity.
  • VTCA must be strictly construed; failure to name the responsible agency bars the VTCA claim; immunity applies if this defect is not cured.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Did notice name the responsible agency as VTCA requires? Truelove argues notice is adequate. Commonwealth argues notice must name the agency and it did not. Notice defective; failure to name agency bars VTCA claim.
Is actual/substantial notice sufficient under the VTCA? Plaintiff contends substantial compliance is enough. VTCA requires strict adherence; substantial compliance not recognized. Strict adherence required; substantial notice not enough.
Does immunity apply given the notice defect? Argues immunity may not apply if notice adequate. If notice defective, immunity applies by VTCA construct. Notice defects foreclose VTCA waiver; immunity sustained on dismissal.
Is the activity of renting park cabins a legislative/proprietary function immune from suit? Renting cabins could be non-legislative and subject to VTCA. Legislative-type decision; immune from suit. Cabin-rental function deemed legislative; immune from liability.

Key Cases Cited

  • Melanson v. Commonwealth, 261 Va. 178 (2001) (VTCA strict construction governs immunity and notice.)
  • Halberstam v. Commonwealth, 251 Va. 248 (1996) (notice must strictly identify time/place and agency.)
  • Haley v. Haley, 272 Va. 703 (2006) (actual notice does not cure strict VTCA defects.)
  • Town of Crewe v. Marler, 228 Va. 109 (1984) (where an element is wholly absent, notice defective.)
  • Heller v. City of Virginia Beach, 213 Va. 683 (1973) (substantive compliance limitations in municipal liability contexts.)
  • VEPCO v. Hampton Redevelopment Auth., 217 Va. 30 (1976) (legislative decisions may be immune from suit.)
  • Fenom v. City of Norfolk, 203 Va. 551 (1962) (municipal context; legislative vs. proprietary function considerations.)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Truelove v. Commonwealth
Court Name: Surry County Circuit Court
Date Published: Aug 29, 2012
Citations: 2012 Va. Cir. LEXIS 190; 2012 WL 9735224; 85 Va. Cir. 282; Case No. CL11-1048
Docket Number: Case No. CL11-1048
Court Abbreviation: Surry Cir. Ct.
Log In