History
  • No items yet
midpage
714 S.E.2d 289
S.C.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Trotter, a Trane employee via Spherion, sustained a back injury allegedly while turbulating tubes in February 2005.
  • She underwent a February 21, 2005 surgery after MRI showed a large L5-S1 disc herniation and nerve compression.
  • Trotter filed a Form 50 May 11, 2005; Trane denied, claiming lack of timely notice and insufficient proof of work-related injury.
  • A single commissioner found a compensable back injury with medical benefits and temporary total disability; she denied Trane’s continuance and open-record requests for depositions.
  • Court of Appeals partially reversed, vacated, and remanded, holding the Commission abused its discretion by denying depositions; this Court granted certiorari.
  • This Court reversed the Court of Appeals, reinstated the Commission’s order, and ordered correction of scrivener’s date errors.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Continance/record-open rulings abuse Trotter Trane No abuse; Commission decisions within discretion
Deposition of Dr. James Trotter Trane No abuse; strategic reasons insufficient for reversal
Deposition of Charleston Trotter Trane No abuse; Charleston's illness justified record closure
Scrivener's error regarding accident date Trotter Trane Correct scrivener's errors; change December 31, 2004 to January 31, 2005

Key Cases Cited

  • Gurley v. Mills Mill, 225 S.C. 46, 80 S.E.2d 745 (1954) (continuance decisions lie in the trial court's discretion)
  • Williams v. Bordon's, Inc., 274 S.C. 275, 262 S.E.2d 881 (1980) (continuances require no prejudice to warrant reversal)
  • Sundown Operating Co. v. Intedge Indus., Inc., 383 S.C. 601, 681 S.E.2d 885 (2009) (abuse of discretion requires lack of evidentiary support or legal error)
  • Clark v. Cantrell, 339 S.C. 369, 529 S.E.2d 528 (2000) (duty to support factual findings with evidence)
  • Bartlett v. Rachels, 375 S.C. 348, 652 S.E.2d 432 (Ct.App.2007) (continuances and trial management discretion)
  • Burroughs v. Worsham, 352 S.C. 382, 574 S.E.2d 215 (Ct.App.2002) (trial-management discretion)
  • Morris v. State, 371 S.C. 278, 639 S.E.2d 53 (2006) (discretionary denials of continuances are rarely overturned)
  • Pierre v. Seaside Farms, Inc., 386 S.C. 534, 689 S.E.2d 615 (2010) (APA standard for appellate review of workers' compensation decisions)
  • Transp. Ins. Co. v. South Carolina Second Injury Fund, 389 S.C. 422, 699 S.E.2d 687 (2010) (standard of review under APA for workers' comp)
  • Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc., 276 S.C. 130, 276 S.E.2d 304 (1981) (reliance on evidentiary record in review)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Trotter v. TRANE COIL FACILITY
Court Name: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Date Published: Aug 15, 2011
Citations: 714 S.E.2d 289; 393 S.C. 637; 2011 S.C. LEXIS 262; 27024
Docket Number: 27024
Court Abbreviation: S.C.
Log In
    Trotter v. TRANE COIL FACILITY, 714 S.E.2d 289