History
  • No items yet
midpage
736 S.E.2d 321
Va.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Virginia Supreme Court certified a question on interpreting all-risk homeowners policy exclusions as applied to Chinese drywall.
  • Ward sought coverage from TravCo; TravCo denied and the district court granted summary judgment for exclusion.
  • Ward’s home (built 2007) in Virginia Beach had drywall installed that allegedly off-gassed sulfur compounds, damaging HVAC, electronics, and emitting odors.
  • Policy exclusions at issue: latent defect; faulty, inadequate or defective materials; rust or corrosion; and pollutants.
  • The Court employs de novo interpretation of the contract, holds each exclusion unambiguous, and finds them to preclude coverage for the drywall losses.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Latent defect exclusion applies Ward argues noscitur a sociis creates ambiguity; defect hidden and undiscoverable. TravCo argues exclusion is plain and unambiguous; drywall problem is latent. Subpart (a) affirmed; exclusion plainly excludes damage.
Faulty/inadequate/defective materials exclusion applies Ward contends terms undefined; drywall not defective in function. TravCo asserts drywall is defective and exclusion applies. Subpart (b) affirmed; drywall deemed defective and exclusion applicable.
Rust or other corrosion exclusion applies Ward contends no gradual corrosion; noscitur a sociis limits meaning. TravCo argues plain language covers corrosion and no temporal reading is warranted. Subpart (c) affirmed; corrosion exclusion applies to drywall-related damage.
Pollution exclusion applies Ward claims exclusion is overbroad/ambiguous and not limited to traditional pollution. TravCo contends sulfur gases are irritants/contaminants, within plain language. Subpart (d) affirmed; pollution exclusion covers emission of sulfur gases from drywall.

Key Cases Cited

  • PBM Nutritionals, LLC v. Lexington Ins. Co., 283 Va. 624 (Va. 2012) (unambiguous exclusions must be enforced as written)
  • City of Chesapeake v. States Self-Insurers Risk Retention Group, Inc., 271 Va. 574 (Va. 2006) (contract language construed in line with insured's coverage)
  • Transcontinental Ins. Co. v. RBMW, Inc., 262 Va. 502 (Va. 2001) (de novo review for insurance contracts)
  • Glens Falls Ins. Co. v. Long, 195 Va. 117 (Va. 1953) (latent defect definition for insurance contexts)
  • Cuccinelli v. Rector & Visitors of the Univ. of Virginia, 283 Va. 420 (Va. 2012) (noscitur a sociis doctrine applied in Virginia context)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: TravCo Insurance Co. v. Ward
Court Name: Supreme Court of Virginia
Date Published: Nov 1, 2012
Citations: 736 S.E.2d 321; 284 Va. 547; 120347
Docket Number: 120347
Court Abbreviation: Va.
Log In
    TravCo Insurance Co. v. Ward, 736 S.E.2d 321