Transfer of Structured Settlement Payment Rights ex rel. Saucier v. Saucier
130 So. 3d 1108
| Miss. Ct. App. | 2013Background
- Saucier settled a personal-injury claim and entered a structured settlement with Aviva; two scheduled payments totaling $350,000 (Assigned Payments) were at issue.
- Saucier later transferred the Assigned Payments to Woodbridge Investments LLC for $220,000; Mississippi MSSPA proceedings approved this transfer via a Transfer Order.
- Woodbridge did not fund the transfer; it referred Saucier to RSL Funding LLC, which later entered an Amended Transfer Agreement to transfer to RSL.
- Amended Order I (Feb. 6, 2009) approved the transfer to RSL; Amended Order II (Mar. 12, 2009) removed BOI as payee and designated RSL as sole assignee; the Stipulation governing this transfer designated Massachusetts law and contained no arbitration clause.
- RSL’s efforts to enforce arbitration were challenged by Saucier; MSSPA notice requirements were allegedly not met, and the transfer was ultimately deemed not effective; the chancery court issued injunctions and denied RSL’s arbitration relief, remanding damages and Rule 11 issues for later proceedings.
- This appeal concerns whether the chancellor properly denied arbitration and granted permanent injunctive relief, with damages under Rule 11 to be addressed on remand.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Was the transfer to RSL effective under MSSPA, making arbitration enforceable? | Saucier argues the MSSPA required notice and funding; the transfer to RSL was not valid. | RSL contends the Amended Transfer Agreement and Orders validly approved the transfer and invoked arbitration. | No; the transfer was not effective under MSSPA, so arbitration provisions were not enforceable. |
| Should the court stay proceedings and compel arbitration based on the asserted arbitration clauses? | Saucier argues the arbitration clause should control via separability and MSSPA validity. | RSL seeks to stay court proceedings and refer to arbitration under FAA and MSSPA. | Denied; the chancellor properly denied stay and issued a permanent injunction against arbitration. |
Key Cases Cited
- Symetra Life Ins. v. Rapid Settlements, Ltd., 567 F.3d 754 (5th Cir. 2009) (arbitration cannot effect a transfer when MSSPA approval is lacking)
- Sawyers v. Herrin-Gear Chevrolet Co., 26 So.3d 1026 (Miss. 2010) (final decision on arbitration appellate jurisdiction under Miss. rules)
- East Ford, Inc. v. Taylor, 826 So.2d 709 (Miss. 2002) (rigorous enforcement of arbitration agreements; public policy favoring arbitration)
