History
  • No items yet
midpage
Town of Barrington v. Townsend
164 N.H. 241
| N.H. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Respondent Townsend owns 43 Hall Road in Barrington and has historically lived in RVs on the property.
  • Sites on the property had utility hookups and were used for guests; Townsend claimed about 10 full hookups in 2009.
  • After an RV fire in 2008, Townsend moved into his barn, a two-story structure with living amenities, workshop, and office.
  • In March 2009 the Town issued a zoning violation/cease and desist order for using the barn as a dwelling and for camping on the lot without permits.
  • Townsend moved to comply but did not obtain site plan or occupancy approvals; the Town filed suit in July 2009 seeking injunctions, penalties, and fees.
  • In February 2010 the court granted summary judgment for the Town on the campground- and dwelling-use violations; attorney’s fees were awarded to the Town.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the campground use violated the zoning ordinance as a non-residential use Townsend disputed that use was non-residential; Town argued no material fact on non-residential classification. Townsend argued the RV campsite was residential by virtue of guest accommodations, not a non-residential use. Non-residential use established; legal determination affirmed.
Whether Townsend’s barn was illegally used as a dwelling without a certificate of occupancy Township sought injunction based on continued dwelling use without occupancy certification. Townsend claimed he moved out and any injunction was punitive for past conduct only. Court upheld injunction and dwelling-use finding; continued use supported by evidence.
Whether the attorney’s fees award to the Town was proper Town contends fees reasonable and proportionate to prevailing claims. Townsend argued the fee amount and allocation were not adequately supported. Fees awarded was within the trial court’s discretion; upheld.

Key Cases Cited

  • Bates v. Vt. Mut. Ins. Co., 157 N.H. 391 (N.H. 2008) (summary judgment standard; de novo review of law)
  • Town of Greenland v. Bunker, 118 N.H. 783 (N.H. 1978) (interpretation of undefined terms in zoning ordinance)
  • Thurston Enterprises, Inc. v. Baldi, 128 N.H. 760 (N.H. 1986) (injunctions focus on future violations)
  • Funtown USA Inc. v. Town of Conway, 129 N.H. 352 (N.H. 1987) (eight factors for determining attorney’s fee reasonableness)
  • Demers Agency v. Widney, 155 N.H. 658 (N.H. 2007) (standard of review for attorney’s fees)
  • Arcidi v. Town of Rye, 150 N.H. 694 (N.H. 2004) (appeals; discretion in fee awards)
  • H Hillside Assocs. of Hollis v. Maine Bonding & Cos. Co., 135 N.H. 325 (N.H. 1992) (scope of question on appeal)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Town of Barrington v. Townsend
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Oct 16, 2012
Citation: 164 N.H. 241
Docket Number: No. 2010-559
Court Abbreviation: N.H.