History
  • No items yet
midpage
Torres v. K & T Provisions, Inc.
1:20-cv-05642
E.D.N.Y
Mar 28, 2025
Read the full case

Background

  • Jose Antonio Torres sued K&T Provisions, Inc. and its owner, Robert Eliodromytis, for unpaid minimum and overtime wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and New York Labor Law (NYLL).
  • Torres alleged he worked six days a week, 12-13 hours per day, but was paid $500-$600 per week in cash, without required wage statements or notices.
  • Defendants disputed the number of hours worked and claimed Torres was part-time, paid at or above minimum wage.
  • After protracted litigation—including discovery, failed mediation, and pretrial conferences—the parties settled: Defendants agreed to pay Torres $30,000 for his claims and $30,000 to his counsel in attorneys’ fees, subject to court approval.
  • Plaintiff's counsel submitted contemporaneous time records totaling 162.8 hours and sought court approval for the agreed fees.
  • The motion for attorneys’ fees was referred for a report and recommendation, with the court tasked to determine the reasonableness of the request.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Entitlement to attorneys’ fees under FLSA & NYLL Fees and costs are mandatory if plaintiff prevails No opposition to entitlement Plaintiff is entitled to reasonable fees
Reasonableness of hourly rates requested $400/hr for lead attorney, $100/hr for paralegal reflect market rates for wage/hour work No specific objection Requested rates are reasonable
Reasonableness of hours billed 162.8 hours were reasonably necessary for litigation and settlement No specific objection Hours billed were reasonable for effort expended
Appropriateness of total fee in relation to lodestar Negotiated fee ($30,000) is less than lodestar and reasonable given all factors No opposition $30,000 in fees approved (lodestar multiplier <1)

Key Cases Cited

  • Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015) (requiring judicial approval of FLSA settlements to ensure fairness)
  • Fisher v. SD Prot., Inc., 948 F.3d 593 (2d Cir. 2020) (fees in FLSA actions not capped by proportionality but by reasonableness)
  • Arbor Hill Concerned Citizens Neighborhood Ass’n v. Cnty. of Albany, 522 F.3d 182 (2d Cir. 2008) (establishing the reasonable hourly rate standard for fee awards)
  • Millea v. Metro-N. R. Co., 658 F.3d 154 (2d Cir. 2011) (describing the lodestar as presumptively reasonable for fee calculations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Torres v. K & T Provisions, Inc.
Court Name: District Court, E.D. New York
Date Published: Mar 28, 2025
Docket Number: 1:20-cv-05642
Court Abbreviation: E.D.N.Y