Titlow v. Burt
2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 10241
| 6th Cir. | 2012Background
- Titlow, a transgender prisoner, was convicted in Michigan state court of second-degree murder of her uncle, Donald Rogers, in August 2000.
- She initially accepted a plea to manslaughter with a 7–15 year sentence in exchange for testifying against Billie Rogers and waiving appeal issues; the plea was negotiated by Lustig.
- Before sentencing, Titlow changed attorneys to Toca; Toca did not adequately review the defense file or the discovery materials before advising withdrawal of the plea.
- Titlow ultimately stood trial in March 2002, was convicted of second-degree murder, and sentenced to 20–40 years’ imprisonment.
- The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed, and Titlow pursued federal habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in the district court, which denied relief but granted a certificate of appealability.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Toca's plea-bargaining representation was ineffective | Titlow argues Toca failed to investigate and advise properly, causing an uninformed withdrawal of the plea | Toca contends his advice was reasonable and the state court properly weighed the record | Titlow's claim succeeds; district court erred in rejecting ineffective-assistance claim under Strickland/Lafler framework |
| What remedy is appropriate for the violated Sixth Amendment right | Remedy should align with Lafler and remand to reoffer the original plea | State should not be forced to reoffer; could proceed with resentencing | Remand with 90 days to reoffer the original plea or, if not, release Titlow; trial court may consider remaking remedy consistent with Lafler |
Key Cases Cited
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) (establishes two-prong test for ineffective assistance)
- Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (1985) (applies Strickland to plea bargaining)
- Lafler v. Cooper, 132 S. Ct. 1376 (2012) (prejudice from rejected plea; remedy when plea is in play)
- Smith v. United States, 348 F.3d 545 (2003) (duty to inform client about elements and sentencing exposure)
- Magana v. Hofbauer, 263 F.3d 542 (2001) (affidavits from counsel; considerations of plea negotiations)
- Moss v. United States, 323 F.3d 445 (2003) (pre-plea guidance may be deficient; evaluation of counsel's duties)
- Short v. United States, 471 F.3d 686 (2006) (heavy burden to show counsel failed to learn facts of the case)
- Dickerson v. Bagley, 453 F.3d 690 (2006) (investigation as part of reasonable performance)
- Dando v. Yukins, 461 F.3d 791 (2006) (limits deference for incomplete investigations)
- Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362 (2000) (definition of reasonable probability and standard of review)
- Cullen v. Pinholster, 131 S. Ct. 1388 (2011) (AEDPA deference; use record before state court)
