History
  • No items yet
midpage
Titlow v. Burt
2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 10241
| 6th Cir. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Titlow, a transgender prisoner, was convicted in Michigan state court of second-degree murder of her uncle, Donald Rogers, in August 2000.
  • She initially accepted a plea to manslaughter with a 7–15 year sentence in exchange for testifying against Billie Rogers and waiving appeal issues; the plea was negotiated by Lustig.
  • Before sentencing, Titlow changed attorneys to Toca; Toca did not adequately review the defense file or the discovery materials before advising withdrawal of the plea.
  • Titlow ultimately stood trial in March 2002, was convicted of second-degree murder, and sentenced to 20–40 years’ imprisonment.
  • The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed, and Titlow pursued federal habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in the district court, which denied relief but granted a certificate of appealability.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Toca's plea-bargaining representation was ineffective Titlow argues Toca failed to investigate and advise properly, causing an uninformed withdrawal of the plea Toca contends his advice was reasonable and the state court properly weighed the record Titlow's claim succeeds; district court erred in rejecting ineffective-assistance claim under Strickland/Lafler framework
What remedy is appropriate for the violated Sixth Amendment right Remedy should align with Lafler and remand to reoffer the original plea State should not be forced to reoffer; could proceed with resentencing Remand with 90 days to reoffer the original plea or, if not, release Titlow; trial court may consider remaking remedy consistent with Lafler

Key Cases Cited

  • Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) (establishes two-prong test for ineffective assistance)
  • Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (1985) (applies Strickland to plea bargaining)
  • Lafler v. Cooper, 132 S. Ct. 1376 (2012) (prejudice from rejected plea; remedy when plea is in play)
  • Smith v. United States, 348 F.3d 545 (2003) (duty to inform client about elements and sentencing exposure)
  • Magana v. Hofbauer, 263 F.3d 542 (2001) (affidavits from counsel; considerations of plea negotiations)
  • Moss v. United States, 323 F.3d 445 (2003) (pre-plea guidance may be deficient; evaluation of counsel's duties)
  • Short v. United States, 471 F.3d 686 (2006) (heavy burden to show counsel failed to learn facts of the case)
  • Dickerson v. Bagley, 453 F.3d 690 (2006) (investigation as part of reasonable performance)
  • Dando v. Yukins, 461 F.3d 791 (2006) (limits deference for incomplete investigations)
  • Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362 (2000) (definition of reasonable probability and standard of review)
  • Cullen v. Pinholster, 131 S. Ct. 1388 (2011) (AEDPA deference; use record before state court)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Titlow v. Burt
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: May 22, 2012
Citation: 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 10241
Docket Number: 10-2488
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir.