Timnath Trail v. Town of Timnath
24CA1372
| Colo. Ct. App. | Jun 26, 2025Background
- Timnath Trail LLC (“Timnath Trail”) owns property in the Town of Timnath, Colorado, governed by a 2008 annexation agreement with the Town.
- The agreement required Timnath Trail to pay certain school fees and development impact fees to the Town upon development.
- From June to September 2018, Timnath Trail obtained permits to build 176 multi-family units, paying $1,463,792 in development and school fees under formulas disputed by both parties.
- In October 2022, Timnath Trail sued the Town, alleging it was overcharged, asserting the wrong fee formulas were used.
- The district court applied a three-year statute of limitations, finding the claim time-barred and granting summary judgment to the Town. Timnath Trail appealed, arguing for a six-year limitations period for some fees and challenging the accrual date.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Statute of limitations on development impact fee claim | Six-year period applies because the amounts were determinable by contract formula | Three-year period applies as fees were not liquidated or determinable | Six-year period applies to development impact fees; summary judgment reversed on this point |
| Statute of limitations on school fee claim | School fees were also determinable; six-year limit applies | School fees are not determinable, subject to change; three-year limit applies | Three-year period applies; summary judgment for Town on school fees affirmed |
| Date of accrual for statute of limitations | Accrual should be July 2020 when overcharge discussions began | Accrual began with 2018 payments when facts were discoverable | Accrual was latest in August 2018; suit on school fees time-barred |
| Proper calculation of development impact fees | Amount was contractually set at $4,913 (+$2,000) per unit, not $7,691 | Fee should be based on 2015 Town Report in effect at permit issuance | Agreement formulas "locked in" lower rate until 2024; dispute not resolved on merit |
Key Cases Cited
- Rotenberg v. Richards, 899 P.2d 365 (Colo. App. 1995) (A debt is liquidated or determinable if the amount due is capable of ascertainment by reference to agreement or simple computation)
- Fishburn v. City of Colorado Springs, 919 P.2d 847 (Colo. App. 1995) (Development fees easily calculable if the contract states fixed rates or formula)
