midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
2013 Ohio 1051
Ohio Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Thompson and Downing have a child, A.T., born April 29, 2008; parties were never married; Downing has had temporary custody since 2011.
  • May 19, 2011 Downing filed a motion for custody change; June 14, 2011 Gayle Thompson (maternal grandmother) filed a custody motion.
  • July 22 and 26, 2011 and September 1, 2011 hearings occurred; August 5, 2011 judgment addressed motions and scheduled a September 1, 2011 custody hearing.
  • September 2, 2011 trial court awarded Downing legal custody of the child.
  • Appellants appeal arguing bias/ due process (assignment I) and abuse of discretion in custody award (assignment II); trial court’s bias claim rejected and custody affirmed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the trial court deprived Thompson of due process through bias Thompson alleges magistrate biased in July 22 hearing Downing argues no demonstrated bias; questioning aligned with evidentiary rules Bias claim denied; no substantial bias shown
Whether the trial court abused discretion in awarding custody to Downing Changing custody to nonparent (grandmother) was improper Record supported best interests favoring Downing; evidence sufficient Custody award to Downing affirmed

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Perales, 52 Ohio St.2d 89 (Ohio 1977) (nonparent custody requires parental unsuitability showing for award to nonparent)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Thompson v. Downing
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 18, 2013
Citations: 2013 Ohio 1051; 2011 AP 10 0038
Docket Number: 2011 AP 10 0038
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In