History
  • No items yet
midpage
Thomas v. State
289 Ga. 877
| Ga. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Appellant Roderick Thomas was convicted of murder and multiple related crimes arising from a 2004 home invasion.
  • The robbery-motivated invasion involved Thomas, Marquis Cannon, and Rayshon Holston targeting Mandel Mahama and Eric Weiner.
  • Rhodes (17) was killed; others were assaulted or threatened during a gunpoint takeover.
  • The State charged Thomas with malice murder, felony murder, aggravated assault, kidnapping, burglary, armed robbery, and related counts.
  • On appeal, Thomas argues four kidnapping convictions lack sufficient asportation evidence and two aggravated assaults should merge with armed robbery; the State contends otherwise.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Sufficiency of asportation for kidnapping convictions Thomas argues asportation was incidental to robbery Garza governs asportation must be more than incidental Garza factors satisfied; asportation supported four kidnappings
Merge of aggravated assault with armed robbery (Krause) Aggravated assault and armed robbery are same transaction Some aggravated assaults are distinct from robberies One aggravated assault (Krause) merged and vacated; other aggravated assault (Weiner) did not merge
Merge of aggravated assault against Krause and armed robbery (Count 8 vs Count 16) Counts arose from same act/transaction Not all overlaps constitute same act Count 8 merged into Count 16; vacate 20-year sentence for the merged count
Overall sufficiency of the evidence supporting other convictions Evidence supports all convictions beyond reasonable doubt Some counts lack sufficient proof Sufficiency upheld for other counts; reversed/remanded only for identified mergings

Key Cases Cited

  • Garza v. State, 284 Ga. 696, 670 S.E.2d 73 (2009) (asportation must be more than incidental to another crime)
  • Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979) (sufficiency review standard for criminal verdicts)
  • Brown v. State, 288 Ga. 902, 708 S.E.2d 294 (2011) (asportation factors may support a conviction)
  • Henderson v. State, 285 Ga. 240, 675 S.E.2d 28 (2009) (relevant to asportation and separate-offense analysis)
  • Cooper v. State, 287 Ga. 861, 700 S.E.2d 593 (2010) (merger analysis for aggravated assault and armed robbery)
  • Long v. State, 287 Ga. 886, 700 S.E.2d 399 (2010) (act/transaction merger framework)
  • Drinkard v. Walker, 281 Ga. 211, 636 S.E.2d 530 (2006) (merger principles in multiple convictions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Thomas v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Oct 17, 2011
Citation: 289 Ga. 877
Docket Number: S11A0962
Court Abbreviation: Ga.