History
  • No items yet
midpage
Thomas v. Reserves Network
2011 Ohio 5857
Ohio Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Thomas injured when McCown's tow motor toppled a tire rack at Central Ohio Warehouse on Oct. 4, 2007; he received workers’ comp.
  • Reserves Network and I-Force supplied workers; McCown and Thomas were placed at Central Ohio.
  • Thomas filed suit Sept. 11, 2009 against McCown, Reserves Network, Central Ohio, and I-Force.
  • Thomas alleged negligence against McCown/Reserves Network/Central Ohio and intentional torts against I-Force/Central Ohio.
  • Trial court denied Thomas’s motion to amend (Aug. 13, 2010) and granted summary judgment to defendants; judgment affirmed on appeal.
  • Thomas sought leave to amend to add negligent hiring/retention against Reserves Network and Central Ohio; motions for summary judgment followed

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the court abused by denying leave to amend Thomas sought Civ.R. 15(A) amendment; timely, good faith Amendment untimely; would prejudice defendants No abuse; amendment denied
Whether summary judgment was proper on negligence against Reserves Network and McCown Genuine disputes about employment relationships and immunity Fellow servant immunity and lack of employer liability Summary judgment proper; immunity/agency findings supported
Whether Reserves Network could be liable via respondeat superior Reserves Network could be liable if McCown were its employee McCown was Central Ohio’s employee; Reserves Network not liable Reserves Network not liable via respondeat superior

Key Cases Cited

  • Merrill Lynch Mortgage Lending, Inc. v. 1867 West Market, L.L.C., 2007-Ohio-2198 (9th Dist. No. 23443, 2007) (amendment timing under Civ.R. 15)
  • Wallner v. Thorne, 2010-Ohio-2146 (9th Dist.) (discretion in amendment rulings)
  • Peterson v. Teodosio, 34 Ohio St.2d 161 (1973) (liberal standard for leave to amend)
  • Brown v. FirstEnergy Corp., 2005-Ohio-712 (9th Dist.) (prejudice when amendment after summary judgment deadline)
  • Dresher v. Burt, 75 Ohio St.3d 280 (1996) (initial burden on moving party in summary judgment)
  • Cheriki v. Black River Industries, Inc., 2008-Ohio-2602 (9th Dist.) (customer-employer immunity when control of manner/means retained)
  • Daniels v. MacGregor Co., 1965-Ohio-93 (Ohio) (employer immune when customer controls work details)
  • Foran v. Fisher Foods, Inc., 1985-Ohio-193 (Ohio) (day-to-day control determines employer for workers’ comp)
  • Vacha v. North Ridgeville, 2011-Ohio-2446 (9th Dist.) (workers’ comp immunity doctrine as codified)
  • Lovett v. Lorain Comm. Hosp., 2004-Ohio-598 (9th Dist.) (factors for employee vs. independent contractor)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Thomas v. Reserves Network
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 14, 2011
Citation: 2011 Ohio 5857
Docket Number: 10CA009886
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.