The State v. Bragg
332 Ga. App. 608
| Ga. Ct. App. | 2015Background
- Bragg challenged an indictment for violating Georgia’s Employment Security Law as barred by OCGA § 17-3-1 (c)’s four-year statute of limitation.
- The State contends tolling under OCGA § 17-3-2 (2) applies for the period the crime was unknown.
- Two DOL databases track claimants and wages; a skip-trace program compares them quarterly using Social Security numbers.
- A quarterly wage audit inquiry is sent to employers when the system shows a claimant worked while on unemployment benefits.
- Bragg received unemployment benefits in 2009; the DOL identified her as early as January 1, 2010; employer confirmed wages on February 2, 2010.
- The State waited to charge Bragg until January 7, 2014; Bragg moved to bar the indictment under the four-year limit.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Does OCGA § 17-3-2 (2) toll the statute when the crime is unknown? | State argues tolling applies from discovery of unknown crime. | Bragg asserts tolling only applies if the crime is unknown to the victim until a later date and not based on State knowledge. | Tolling not proven; limitation began Jan 1, 2010; indictment outside four years. |
Key Cases Cited
- Harper v. State, 292 Ga. 557 (2013) (knowledge imputation for tolling purposes; standards applied)
- Mullins, 321 Ga. App. 671 (2013) ( State must plead and prove tolling)
- Moss v. State, 220 Ga. App. 150 (1996) (exception to statute must be alleged and proven)
- Robins, 296 Ga. App. 437 (2009) (lack of knowledge of act, not merely illegality, tolling standard)
- Jenkins v. State, 278 Ga. 598 (2004) (not tolled by routine investigation; evidence needed)
- Womack v. State, 260 Ga. 21 (1990) (general tolling principles for criminal statutes)
