24 N.Y.3d 615
NY2014Background
- Officer Merino stopped defendant for driving erratically and observed signs of intoxication; defendant claimed to have had a beer after work at 4:00 p.m., despite the encounter occurring at 5:00 a.m.
- Merino conducted a pat-down; a switchblade knife was found in defendant’s pocket, and defendant was arrested for weapon possession.
- Defendant moved to suppress the knife; the Appellate Division affirmed the denial of suppression, treating the pat-down as incident to arrest because probable cause for DWI existed.
- The Court granted leave to appeal to address whether the search could be justified as incident to an arrest when the arrest would not have occurred but for the search.
- The majority held that the search was not incident to a valid arrest because, but for the search, there would have been no arrest.
- Dissent argued that Knowles v. Iowa is not controlling and urged preservation of the Appellate Division’s decision.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether a pat-down can be incident to arrest if the arrest would not have occurred but for the search | Merino would arrest for DWI without the knife if the search had not occurred | Arrest could still be valid based on probable cause; the search is incident to arrest when warrant exceptions apply | Not held; search not incident to arrest because arrest would not have occurred but for the search |
| Is Knowles controlling for determining incident-to-arrest in this context | Knowles supports treating the search as incident to arrest when probable cause exists | Knowles is distinguishable; issuance of a citation does not implicate incident-to-arrest doctrine here | Knowles not controlling; the facts fall outside its bright-line rule |
| Did the majority correctly apply Fourth Amendment doctrine to suppress the knife and dismiss the indictment | Appellate Division's reasoning should stand given contours of incident-to-arrest | The knife search was justified by probable cause and timing of events | Yes; suppression granted and indictment dismissed |
Key Cases Cited
- Knowles v. Iowa, 525 U.S. 113 (1998) (search incident to arrest requires actual arrest; citation not enough)
- Rawlings v. Kentucky, 448 U.S. 98 (1980) (arrest soon after search can render search and arrest one event)
- People v. Evans, 43 N.Y.2d 160 (1977) (timing of search/arrest as one event)
- Devenpeck v. Alford, 543 U.S. 146 (2004) (arrest based on probable cause of a different offense does not defeat pursuit of valid arrest)
- United States v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 218 (1973) (search incident to arrest doctrine; officer safety and evidence preservation)
- Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 (1996) (stop valid when supported by probable cause irrespective of motive)
- Riley v. California, 134 S. Ct. 2473 (2014) (limits Knowles and extends concerns about officer safety and evidence)
