History
  • No items yet
midpage
The People v. Andrew R. Bushey
29 N.Y.3d 158
NY
2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Early morning Aug 10, 2014: Buffalo State University officer observed defendant driving; no traffic violation or erratic driving seen.
  • Officer manually entered the vehicle's license plate into his patrol computer linked to the DMV database and discovered the vehicle registration was suspended for unpaid parking tickets.
  • After learning registration was suspended, the officer followed and stopped the vehicle; the database later showed the driver’s license was also suspended; defendant was arrested for DWI and related registration/license offenses.
  • Defendant moved to suppress, arguing the license-plate query was an impermissible search and the stop lacked legal basis; suppression court granted motion and dismissed charges.
  • Appellate court reversed; the Court of Appeals granted leave and affirmed the reversal, holding plate checks are not searches and can supply probable cause for a stop.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether running a license plate through the DMV database is a Fourth Amendment search Plate check is permissible and not a search; officers may use publicly observable info Running the plate is a search requiring probable cause or suspicion Not a search; no reasonable expectation of privacy in plate or associated DMV registration info
Whether information from a plate check can justify stopping the vehicle DMV information showing registration suspension provides probable cause to stop Officer needed prior reasonable suspicion before running the plate Yes; plate check can supply probable cause, so subsequent stop was lawful
Whether officer may run plate absent any suspicion Police may check plates in performance of duties to enforce registration laws Officer needed same legal basis as for a stop (probable cause) before running plate Officer may run plate without prior suspicion; observing plate and querying database is permitted
Privacy protections under federal driver-privacy statute (DPPA) DPPA does not bar law enforcement access to DMV data for official functions DPPA creates expectation that DMV info is private from queries DPPA permits release to law enforcement; it does not create a Fourth Amendment privacy expectation

Key Cases Cited

  • People v Ingle, 36 N.Y.2d 413 (N.Y. 1975) (arbitrary stops without legal basis violate the Fourth Amendment)
  • Katz v United States, 389 U.S. 347 (U.S. 1967) (test for reasonable expectation of privacy)
  • People v Weaver, 12 N.Y.3d 433 (N.Y. 2009) (articulating Katz two-part expectation-of-privacy test)
  • United States v Miranda-Sotolongo, 827 F.3d 663 (7th Cir. 2016) (using license plate to retrieve registration info is not a Fourth Amendment search)
  • United States v Diaz-Castaneda, 494 F.3d 1146 (9th Cir. 2007) (observing plate and accessing nonprivate database info is not a search)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: The People v. Andrew R. Bushey
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 4, 2017
Citation: 29 N.Y.3d 158
Docket Number: N0. 50
Court Abbreviation: NY