History
  • No items yet
midpage
The Minesen Co. v. McHugh
2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 4376
| Fed. Cir. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Minesen contracted with the Army Fund in 1993 to build and operate the Inn at Schofield Barracks for 32 years.
  • The Inn was deemed government quarters under the JFTR, creating a mandatory patronage incentive for military travelers.
  • The JFTR amendments in 1997–1998 removed the mandatory per diem forfeiture, allegedly altering the contract’s core bargain.
  • ASBCA in 2006 found a breach by the Fund and remanded for damages; Minesen sought past, future profits, and other relief.
  • In 2008 Minesen filed a duplicative claim alleging failure to cure; the CO and ASBCA treated it as duplicative of the 2006 dispute.
  • The ASBCA ultimately dismissed the 2008 claim as duplicative, and Minesen appealed to the Federal Circuit.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the CDA applies to this appeal Minesen argues Tucker Act jurisdiction survives Slattery; NAFI status does not bar CDA review. Fund contends NAFI excludes claims from the CDA and defeats this court’s jurisdiction. Court assumes jurisdiction for purposes of addressing the waiver issue.
Whether Minesen validly waived its right to Federal Circuit review Minesen asserts the disputes clause is unenforceable under the CDA and public policy; cannot bar review. Fund contends Minesen voluntarily contracted to final ASBCA review with no further appeal. Waiver is enforceable; the dispute is dismissed for lack of further appellate review.

Key Cases Cited

  • Slattery v. United States, 635 F.3d 1298 (Fed.Cir. en banc 2011) (NAFI status does not bar Tucker Act jurisdiction over CDA claims)
  • Bumside-Ott Aviation Training Center v. Dalton, 107 F.3d 854 (Fed.Cir. 1997) (CDA review standards; cannot wholly contract away Board review)
  • Seaboard Lumber Co. v. United States, 903 F.2d 1560 (Fed.Cir. 1990) (CDA provides dual avenues of review; contracts cannot defeat judicial review)
  • McCall v. United States Postal Serv., 839 F.2d 664 (Fed.Cir. 1988) (voluntary waiver of appellate rights enforceable under public policy)
  • Rumery v. United States, 480 U.S. 386 (U.S. 1987) (voluntary waivers in government contracting may be enforceable if knowingly made)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: The Minesen Co. v. McHugh
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Date Published: Mar 2, 2012
Citation: 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 4376
Docket Number: 2010-1453
Court Abbreviation: Fed. Cir.