History
  • No items yet
midpage
The Honorable Kimberly J. Brown, Judge of the Marion Superior Court
4 N.E.3d 619
Ind.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Indiana Supreme Court reviews a disciplinary action against Marion Superior Court Judge Kimberly J. Brown under Article 7, Section 4 and Indiana Rule 25.
  • Special Masters investigated, held a hearing with numerous witnesses and exhibits, and recommended removal from office for 46 of 47 counts.
  • Brown admitted most misconduct in a Submission and urged a 60-day suspension; Masters ultimately recommended removal.
  • Misconduct included mismanagement, delays, and dereliction of duties, plus inappropriate demeanor, retaliation, and hostile environment for staff and attorneys.
  • Delays included late rulings, missing/misfiled paperwork, and failure to vacate reversed judgments; ten defendants were improperly delayed in jail releases in 2013.
  • Court ultimately removed Brown from office effective immediately; removal renders her ineligible for judicial office.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Brown’s misconduct warrants removal from office Brown (Commission) argues removal is required given egregious pattern Brown argues for lesser sanction, e.g., 60-day suspension Removal warranted
Whether mismanagement and delays violated Code of Judicial Conduct Commission proves widespread mismanagement and repeated delays Brown contends some delays are non-recurrent or not pervasive Yes; supported by clear and convincing evidence
Whether inappropriate demeanor and retaliation violated ethics rules Commission demonstrates hostile conduct toward staff and attorneys and retaliation Brown minimizes or disputes severity Yes; conduct violated multiple rules
Whether Brown cooperated with the Commission Commission shows numerous untimely, incomplete, or evasive responses Brown disputes or downplays cooperation Lack of cooperation weighed against Brown
Whether removal is appropriate given the magnitude and persistence of misconduct Removal is necessary to protect integrity of judiciary Suspension could suffice to address issues Removal appropriate; immediate and permanent

Key Cases Cited

  • Matter of Kouros, 816 N.E.2d 21 (Ind.2004) (removal warranted where persistent mismanagement and impact on justice system)
  • Matter of Hawkins, 902 N.E.2d 231 (Ind.2009) (discipline to preserve integrity; timely justice emphasized)
  • Boles, 555 N.E.2d 1284 (Ind.1990) (sixty-day suspension for misconduct involving attorney dispute and retaliation)
  • Danikolas, 838 N.E.2d 422 (Ind.2005) (sixty-day suspension for retaliatory discharge and misrepresentations)
  • Matter of Kouros, 816 N.E.2d 21 (Ind.2004) (discussed as precedent for removal due to systemic court dysfunction)
  • Matter of McClain, 662 N.E.2d 935 (Ind.1996) (duty to cooperate in disciplinary investigations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: The Honorable Kimberly J. Brown, Judge of the Marion Superior Court
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 4, 2014
Citation: 4 N.E.3d 619
Docket Number: 49S00-1308-JD-560
Court Abbreviation: Ind.