The Honorable Kimberly J. Brown, Judge of the Marion Superior Court
4 N.E.3d 619
Ind.2014Background
- Indiana Supreme Court reviews a disciplinary action against Marion Superior Court Judge Kimberly J. Brown under Article 7, Section 4 and Indiana Rule 25.
- Special Masters investigated, held a hearing with numerous witnesses and exhibits, and recommended removal from office for 46 of 47 counts.
- Brown admitted most misconduct in a Submission and urged a 60-day suspension; Masters ultimately recommended removal.
- Misconduct included mismanagement, delays, and dereliction of duties, plus inappropriate demeanor, retaliation, and hostile environment for staff and attorneys.
- Delays included late rulings, missing/misfiled paperwork, and failure to vacate reversed judgments; ten defendants were improperly delayed in jail releases in 2013.
- Court ultimately removed Brown from office effective immediately; removal renders her ineligible for judicial office.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Brown’s misconduct warrants removal from office | Brown (Commission) argues removal is required given egregious pattern | Brown argues for lesser sanction, e.g., 60-day suspension | Removal warranted |
| Whether mismanagement and delays violated Code of Judicial Conduct | Commission proves widespread mismanagement and repeated delays | Brown contends some delays are non-recurrent or not pervasive | Yes; supported by clear and convincing evidence |
| Whether inappropriate demeanor and retaliation violated ethics rules | Commission demonstrates hostile conduct toward staff and attorneys and retaliation | Brown minimizes or disputes severity | Yes; conduct violated multiple rules |
| Whether Brown cooperated with the Commission | Commission shows numerous untimely, incomplete, or evasive responses | Brown disputes or downplays cooperation | Lack of cooperation weighed against Brown |
| Whether removal is appropriate given the magnitude and persistence of misconduct | Removal is necessary to protect integrity of judiciary | Suspension could suffice to address issues | Removal appropriate; immediate and permanent |
Key Cases Cited
- Matter of Kouros, 816 N.E.2d 21 (Ind.2004) (removal warranted where persistent mismanagement and impact on justice system)
- Matter of Hawkins, 902 N.E.2d 231 (Ind.2009) (discipline to preserve integrity; timely justice emphasized)
- Boles, 555 N.E.2d 1284 (Ind.1990) (sixty-day suspension for misconduct involving attorney dispute and retaliation)
- Danikolas, 838 N.E.2d 422 (Ind.2005) (sixty-day suspension for retaliatory discharge and misrepresentations)
- Matter of Kouros, 816 N.E.2d 21 (Ind.2004) (discussed as precedent for removal due to systemic court dysfunction)
- Matter of McClain, 662 N.E.2d 935 (Ind.1996) (duty to cooperate in disciplinary investigations)
