History
  • No items yet
midpage
The City of Fort Wayne v. Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Inc d/b/a All-Phase Electric Supply Co.
998 N.E.2d 733
Ind. Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • All-Phase was a subcontractor on the Courthouse Green project; the City paid the general contractor but the contractor did not pay All-Phase.
  • All-Phase supplied $24,050.71 worth of materials Dec 14, 2010–Feb 7, 2011.
  • All-Phase sent notice to the Fort Wayne mayor on Apr 6, 2011; the City admitted receipt.
  • The City admitted the amount of materials supplied within a Dec 14, 2010–Feb 7, 2011 window and disputed timeliness.
  • The trial court granted summary judgment for All-Phase; the City appeals on notice-related issues.
  • The court interpreted Indiana Code § 36-1-12-12 and addressed who may receive notice and whether it was timely.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was notice properly served on the mayor under §36-1-12-12( b )? All-Phase served the mayor, as permitted by §36-1-12-12-1.2(1) and related definitions. City contends the statute requires notice to a different recipient or is ambiguous about serving the mayor. Yes; notice properly served on the mayor.
Was All-Phase's notice timely under the 60-day deadline? Notice was within 60 days after All-Phase last supplied materials (Feb 7, 2011). Admission only confirms some materials were supplied within the period; it does not prove last date; any issue precludes timeliness. Timely notice; the 60-day window applied and was satisfied.

Key Cases Cited

  • Holiday Hospitality Franchising, Inc. v. AMCO Ins. Co., 983 N.E.2d 574 (Ind. 2013) (summary-judgment framework and burden-shifting on material facts)
  • Town of Avon v. W. Cent. Conservancy Dist., 957 N.E.2d 598 (Ind. 2011) (standard for reviewing summary judgment on undisputed facts)
  • FLM, LLC v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., 973 N.E.2d 1167 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012) (statutory construction and last-antecedent rule guidance)
  • DeLage Landen Fin. Servs., Inc. v. Cmty. Mental Health Ctr., Inc., 965 N.E.2d 693 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012) (personal-knowledge inference in affidavits)
  • Decker v. Zengler, 883 N.E.2d 839 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008) (affidavit personal-knowledge inference)
  • Gen. Motors Corp., Chevrolet Motor Div. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 573 N.E.2d 885 (Ind. 1991) (binding effect of admissions; exceptions exist)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: The City of Fort Wayne v. Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Inc d/b/a All-Phase Electric Supply Co.
Court Name: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 20, 2013
Citation: 998 N.E.2d 733
Docket Number: 02A04-1306-CC-283
Court Abbreviation: Ind. Ct. App.