Teri Root v. Talton Toney
2013 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 127
Iowa2013Background
- Teri Root fled Decatur County after an October 7 choking incident by Talton Toney, traveled ~250 miles to Howard County, and entered a safe house near her parents. She sought medical care and filed a domestic-abuse petition in Howard County within two days of arrival.
- Root began renting a home and looking for work in Howard County shortly after filing. Toney moved to transfer venue to Decatur County, arguing Root did not "reside" in Howard County when she filed.
- The district court held a hearing, found Root was residing in Howard County, denied the transfer, and later entered a final domestic abuse protective order in Root’s favor.
- Toney filed a notice of appeal by mail on the 31st day after judgment. Howard County clerk’s public window had closed at 2:30 p.m. on the thirtieth day pursuant to a Supreme Court supervisory order reducing public hours.
- The parties briefed whether Iowa Code § 4.1(34) — which extends filing deadlines when the clerk’s office is "closed in whole or in part" by Supreme Court order — entitled Toney to a one-day extension, and whether "resides" under Iowa Code § 236.3(1) requires legal domicile or actual residence.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument (Root) | Defendant's Argument (Toney) | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Timeliness: whether Iowa Code § 4.1(34) extended the 30‑day appeal deadline because the clerk’s public window closed early | The Supreme Court’s supervisory rule and December 2, 2009 order (Iowa Ct. R. 22.40) mean partial early closures do not trigger § 4.1(34); thus the appeal was untimely | The partial closure of the clerk’s public window at 2:30 p.m. on day 30 means the office was "closed in whole or in part" by court order, so § 4.1(34) extends the deadline one day and the appeal was timely | Held: § 4.1(34) applied; the early closure constituted a partial closure under the statute, so Toney got a one‑day extension and the appeal was timely. The Court rescinded the prior supervisory order interpretation. |
| Venue (residency): whether "resides" in Iowa Code § 236.3(1) requires legal domicile or actual residence for protective‑order venue | Root: "Resides" should be given a relaxed, actual‑residence meaning for chapter 236 to allow victims who relocate to seek prompt protection | Toney: "Resides" should require legal residence/domicile (more stringent), relying on dissolution‑statute precedent to prevent forum shopping | Held: For chapter 236, "resides" means actual residence (place of dwelling, permanent or temporary). Root was residing in Howard County when she filed; venue there was proper. |
Key Cases Cited
- City of Des Moines v. City Dev. Bd., 633 N.W.2d 305 (Iowa 2001) (timeliness and jurisdictional issues)
- In re Marriage of Mantz, 266 N.W.2d 758 (Iowa 1978) (appeal deadlines are mandatory and jurisdictional)
- W. Int’l & Nat’l Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Kirkpatrick, 396 N.W.2d 359 (Iowa 1986) (legislature may set conditions for appeals)
- Kollman v. McGregor, 39 N.W.2d 302 (Iowa 1949) (distinguishing actual residence from domicile)
- Bartsch v. Bartsch, 636 N.W.2d 3 (Iowa 2001) (domestic abuse statute reflects special solicitude for victims)
