Teresa Sheehan v. City and County of San Francis
2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 3321
9th Cir.2014Background
- Teresa Sheehan, a mentally ill woman in a San Francisco group home, faced a 72-hour involuntary detention under Cal. Welfare & Inst. Code § 5150.
- Hodge, a social worker, sought police assistance to transport Sheehan to a mental health facility after deeming her gravely disabled and dangerous.
- Officers Reynolds and Holder entered Sheehan’s room without a warrant to assess her condition and take her into custody; Sheehan threatened them with a knife.
- After retreating, officers forcibly reentered with backup, resulting in Sheehan being shot five to six times during a confrontation in a confined space.
- Sheehan filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging Fourth Amendment violations, ADA discrimination, and state-law claims; the district court granted summary judgment to defendants.
- Key issues include whether the initial entry, second entry, and deadly force were reasonable under the Fourth Amendment, and whether Monell, ADA, and state-law claims survive.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the initial entry was lawful under the emergency aid exception | Sheehan contends the entry violated the Fourth Amendment. | Defendants argue emergency aid justified initial entry and conduct was reasonable. | Initial entry lawful under emergency aid; triable issues remain for second entry. |
| Whether the second entry violated the Fourth Amendment | Second entry was unreasonable and escalated danger. | Second entry could be justified by emergency aid or exigent circumstances. | Triable issues exist; not entitled to judgment as a matter of law on reasonableness and force used. |
| Whether the shooting violated the Fourth Amendment or was provoked by officers | Officers provoked a deadly confrontation by forced entry without adequate accommodation for mental illness. | Deadly force reasonable given immediate threat from a knife. | Triable issues on provocation; partial qualified immunity on final shot; deadly force reasonable at moment of shooting but potential provocation questions remain. |
| Whether ADA Title II applies to arrests and reasonable accommodation claim | Failure to reasonably accommodate Sheehan’s disability during the incident violated Title II. | ADA applies; exigent circumstances inform reasonableness of accommodations. | ADA Title II applies to arrests; triable issue on failure to reasonably accommodate. |
| Whether Monell claims survive and immunities apply to state-law claims under § 5278 | City’s failures or ratification exposed Monell liability. | Training was adequate and there was no ratification; § 5278 immunizes detention-related claims. | Monell claims properly granted summary judgment; § 5278 immunity does not bar all state-law claims; remand on immunity issues. |
Key Cases Cited
- Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (U.S. 1989) (balance of intrusion and governmental interests in reasonableness of force)
- Alexander v. City & County of San Francisco, 29 F.3d 1355 (9th Cir.1994) (storming mentally ill recluse case; noncompliant entry and provocation doctrine)
- Fisher v. City of San Jose, 558 F.3d 1069 (9th Cir.2009) (continuous search doctrine; emergency aid/exigent circumstances interplay)
- Deorle v. Rutherford, 272 F.3d 1272 (9th Cir.2001) (distinct treatment of emotionally disturbed individuals; force considerations)
- Billington v. Smith, 292 F.3d 1177 (9th Cir.2002) (provocation theory for the use of deadly force in Fourth Amendment)
- Reynolds v. County of San Diego, 84 F.3d 1162 (9th Cir.1996) (use of force and reasonable accommodation considerations; expert evidence admissibility)
- Trevino v. Gates, 9th Cir. 1996 (9th Cir.1996) (monell-like considerations for municipal liability)
- Waller ex rel. Estate of Hunt v. City of Danville, 556 F.3d 171 (4th Cir.2009) (ADA Title II reasonable accommodation; exigency informs reasonableness)
- Gohier v. Enright, 186 F.3d 1216 (10th Cir.1999) (ADA applicability to arrests; title II scope)
- Michigan v. Fisher, 558 U.S. 45 (U.S. 2009) (emergency aid exception requires only potential serious injury; not ironclad proof)
